Claimant Can Pursue Alternate Remedy For Severed Part Of Award Without Limitation Bar: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that time spent in earlier arbitral proceedings can be excluded while computing limitation, even if only part of an arbitral award is set aside and fresh proceedings arise from a different agreement. A single bench of Justice Sandeep V Marne, in an order dated December 17, 2025, said Section 43(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act allows exclusion of...

Liquor Licence Cannot Be Granted Like This: Bombay High Court To Maha Govt Over Permitting Open Sale Of Liquor At Sunburn Festival

In a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) raising concerns over the sale of liquor in the first ever Sunburn Festival, which is being held in Mumbai from December 19 till December 21, the Bombay High Court on Friday questioned the Maharashtra Government's decision to allow liquor at the event, especially when it is going to be held in an open-air venue.A division bench of Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Gautam Ankhad too raised concerns over the decision to allow liquor in such an...

Bombay High Court Bars Chandigarh Firm From Using Bunge India's 'LOTUS' Mark For Edible Oils

The Bombay High Court has permanently restrained Chandigarh-based Lotus Refinery Pvt. Ltd. and its associate entities from using the mark “LOTUS” or any deceptively similar mark for edible oils. The court held that that the adoption of an identical mark for identical goods amounted to trademark infringement and passing off of Bunge India Pvt. Ltd.'s long-standing registered trademark. In...

Bombay High Court Refuses To Stay Conviction Of Sports Minister Manikrao Kokate In 1995 Cheating Case, Suspends Sentence

In a setback for senior Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) (Ajit Pawar Faction) leader Manikrao Kokate, the Bombay High Court on Friday refused to stay his conviction in the 1995 cheating case. However, the court suspended his sentence for the time being. Single-judge Justice Rajesh Laddha heard the revision application filed by Kokate through senior advocate Ravi Kadam and advocate Aniket Nikam urging the court to stay his conviction as he may get unseated or disqualified as a Member of the...

Bombay High Court Upholds MIDC's Priority Allotment Policy For Certain Industries; Says Preferential Allotment Not Arbitrary Under Article 14

The Bombay High Court has held that the policy adopted by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) for priority allotment of industrial plots to specified “thrust sector” industries constitutes a legitimate and reasonable classification permissible under Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court observed that Article 14 does not mandate that all public land must invariably be allotted by public advertisement or auction, and that a rational, transparent policy creating a...

'Consumer Cannot Claim Interest On Statutory Deposit Made U/S 127(2) Of Electricity Act': Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that a consumer has no enforceable statutory right to claim interest on the mandatory pre-deposit made under Section 127(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003, when the assessment of unauthorised use of electricity is set aside in appeal. The Court observed that the deposit under Section 127(2) is a condition precedent for maintaining the statutory appeal and is not a payment towards tariff or consumption charges; in the absence of any express statutory provision...

Income Tax Act | Bombay High Court Allows Treaty-Based Cap Of 10% On DDT For Foreign Shareholder; Sets Aside BFAR Ruling

The Bombay High Court (Goa Bench) has held that Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) paid by an Indian subsidiary to its foreign shareholder must be restricted to the treaty rate of 10% under Article 11 of the India-UK India Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) A Division Bench of Justice Bharati Dangre and Justice Nivedita P. Mehta allowed the appeal filed by the assessee,...

Trimurti Films Sues Dharma, Saregama In Bombay High Court Over 'Saat Samundar Paar' Song In Upcoming Film

Trimurti Films Pvt. Ltd., the producer of the 1992 film Vishwatma, has moved the Bombay High Court seeking to restrain the use of its iconic song “Saat Samundar Paar” in the upcoming Hindi film "Tu Meri Main Tera Main Tera Tu Meri", alleging unauthorised remixing and incorporation of the song without its consent. The suit has been filed against Dharma Production, Namah Pictures...

'Cut-Off Date In Welfare Scheme Not Sacrosanct': Bombay High Court Allows Monetary Benefit Claim By Heirs Of Deceased COVID Frontline Staff

The Bombay High Court has held that the cut-off date prescribed under a welfare scheme meant for COVID-19 frontline workers cannot be applied in a rigid or technical manner so as to defeat the very object of the scheme. The Court observed that such schemes must receive a liberal and beneficial interpretation, particularly where a frontline worker contracted COVID-19 during the currency of the scheme while discharging official duties, but succumbed to the illness shortly thereafter. The Court...

Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Notices Issued Against Mumbai Company After SVLDRS Settlement

The Bombay High Court has held that once a dispute is settled under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 and a Discharge Certificate is issued, tax authorities cannot reopen the matter. A Division Bench of Justice M S Sonak and Justice Advait M Sethna set aside two show cause notices issued by officers of the Central GST Audit-II wing, Mumbai, after the dispute was...

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity Of ODR Clause, Refuses Substitution Of Arbitrator Appointed Through ODR Platform

The Bombay High Court has upheld the validity of an Online Dispute Resolution (“ODR”) clause as well as the arbitrator appointment process conducted through an ODR platform. The Petitioner i.e. Amit Chaurasia (“Chaurasia”) filed an application for substitution of arbitrator. The Bench of Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan reviewed the contract between the parties and observed that...

Patanjali Foods Moves Bombay High Court Against YouTube Channel For Making Defamatory Video, Demands ₹15.5 Crores In Damages

Patanjali Foods has approached the Bombay High Court against popular YouTube Channel 'Trustified Certification' demanding Rs 10.5 crores as damages for loss of reputation and Rs 5 crore as 'special damages' for causing injury to their brand by uploading an allegedly 'defamatory' video against its product 'Nutrela Soya Chunks.'The suit filed through advocate Apoorv Srivastava was listed before...