Navjot Singh Sidhu Is Obstructing Functioning Of The Office Of The Advocate General: Punjab AG APS Deol6 Nov 2021 4:14 PM IST
Recent Judgement Of The Supreme Court In Arjun Khotkar: A Missed Opportunity To Revisit 65B20 July 2020 9:29 PM IST
BREAKING; General Law relating to Secondary Evidence is not applicable to Electronic Evidence; Ratio in Parliament Attack Case [State v. Navjot Sandhu alias Afsan Guru (2005)11 SCC 600] overruled to that extent [Read the Judgment]18 Sept 2014 9:05 PM IST
![BREAKING; General Law relating to Secondary Evidence is not applicable to Electronic Evidence; Ratio in Parliament Attack Case [State v. Navjot Sandhu alias Afsan Guru (2005)11 SCC 600] overruled to that extent [Read the Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/cms/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/SC.jpg "BREAKING; General Law relating to Secondary Evidence is not applicable to Electronic Evidence; Ratio in Parliament Attack Case [State v. Navjot Sandhu alias Afsan Guru (2005)11 SCC 600] overruled to that extent [Read the Judgment]")