Himani Navaratan Oil, Himani Gold Turmeric Ayurvedic Cream Are Ayurvedic Medicine ; Telangana High Court

The Telangana High Court has held that the 10% duty is leviable on Himani Navaratan Oil and Himani Gold Turmeric Ayurvedic Cream as they are classified as ayurvedic medicine and not cosmetics.The bench of Justice P.Sam Koshy and Justice N.Tukaramji has observed that the rapper in whom the cream is sold very emphatically highlights it as an ayurvedic medicine. The rapper also clearly...

Tax Effect In Appeals Below Monetary Limit Of Rs.1 Crore; Kerala High Court Dismisses ​​Dept's Appeal

The Kerala High Court has held that the tax effect in the appeals filed by the income tax department pertaining to assessment years 2006–07, 2007–08, 2008–09, 2009–10, and 2010–11 is well below the monetary limit of Rs. 1 crore and is liable to be dismissed.The bench of Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and Justice Syam Kumar V.M. has observed that, as per Circular No. 3 of 2018...

Chewing Tobacco Packed In High-Density Polyethylene Bags Are 'Wholesale Package'; Cannot Be Taxed As Retail Product Under Excise Act : Supreme Court

The Supreme Court recently held that pouches of chewing tobacco packed in High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) bags would be considered a 'wholesale package' and could not be considered for imposing excise duty as per the provisions relating to retail sale price in the Central Excise Act, 1944.The bench of Justices AS Oka and Pankaj Mithal upheld the decision of the Central Excise Appellate...

Technical Error In Making Application For Final Approval Is No Basis To Deny Benefit Of Sec 80G: Kolkata ITAT

Referring to the decision in case of Anudip Foundation for Social Welfare vs. CIT(Exemption), Kolkata – ITA No. 1341/Kol/2023, the Kolkata ITAT held that assessee will not be deprived of the benefit of Sec 80G due to technical errors occurred in making application because of the confusion and misunderstanding on in properly interpreting the relevant provision. Section 80G of Income...

Assumption Of Jurisdiction Based On Wrong Facts Can't Form Basis For Initiating Reopening: Mumbai ITAT

The Mumbai ITAT there is no question of concealment of fact when the assessee had itself declared the income in its return which was assumed by the AO to be an escaped income. Hence, the ITAT clarified that assumption of jurisdiction based on wrong facts, cannot form basis for initiating reopening. The Division Bench of Anikesh Banerjee (Judicial Member) and Prashant...

Loans Brought Forwarded Can't Form Basis For Addition In Current Year if Genuineness Is Established: Mumbai ITAT

Finding that the genuineness of loan transactions is not verified by the Income tax Authorities, the Mumbai ITAT held that no additions are permitted on account on unsecured loans by disregarding the confirmations & identity of loan creditors produced by assessee. The Divisional Bench of Anikesh Banerjee (Judicial Member) and Prashant Maharishi (Accountant Member) observed...

Cash Deposits During Demonetization Alone Is No Basis To Make Addition In Absence Of Glaring Error In Books: Mumbai ITAT

Finding that cash sales as part of the trading result offered for taxation by the assessee is not disputed, the Mumbai ITAT held that addition is permitted on account of cash deposit during demonetization on mere allegation that books of account are manipulated without its rejection. The Bench presided by Prashant Maharishi (Accountant Member) observed that “Mere cash deposit or...

'Reasons To Believe' For Reopening Must Based On Credible Information : Kolkata ITAT

While quashing the reopening proceedings, the Kolkata ITAT held that any allegation of escapement of income must be backed by information expressing 'reason to believe' and such belief requires to be based on some credible or relevant material. The ITAT clarified that mere borrowed satisfaction from Investigation Wing is no justified ground for initiating reopening, when no...

Additions Can't Be Made In Cases Of Unabated Assessments Without Incriminating Material: Mumbai ITAT

The Mumbai ITAT held that no addition can be made by AO in respect of completed/unabated assessments, in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search u/s 132 or requisition u/s 132A. Section 132A of Income tax Act empowers income tax authorities to carry out a search and seizure of books of accounts, documents, cash & jewellery. Referring to...

Merely Because The Transactions Are Made Through Banking Channel Does Not Itself Prove The Creditworthiness

The Mumbai ITAT held that merely because the transactions are made through banking channel does not itself prove the creditworthiness of the lender and genuineness of the transaction. The Bench of Prashant Maharishi (Accountant Member) observed that “Subsequent repayment of the accommodation entry naturally does not show that the originally credit is genuine and provider of the...

Final Assessment Passed Within Two Days Of Issuing Intimation, Violation Of 143(1) IT Act : Mumbai ITAT

The Mumbai ITAT held that the AO has no jurisdiction to make any adjustment in final assessment order passed u/s 143(3) before thirty days of receiving any response from the assessee on basis of intimation issued u/s 143(1). As per Section 143 of the Income tax Act, the response received from the assessee, if any, shall be considered before making any adjustment, and in a case where...

CESTAT Weekly Round-Up: 7 To 13 July 2024

Black Sand Not A By-Product, Just A Waste; CESTAT Quashes Excise DutyCase Title: M/s. Ashok Leyland Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & Central ExciseThe Chennai Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has clearly erred in fastening the appellant with duty liability on black sand, which was not manufactured.Assessee Entitled To Cash Refund Of Cenvat Credit...