Failure To Furnish Segmental Information U/s 92D By Diamond Trader Is No Basis To Levy Penalty U/s 271G: Mumbai ITAT
Pankaj Bajpai
8 Feb 2024 12:41 PM IST

Next Story
8 Feb 2024 12:41 PM IST
On finding that transfer pricing adjustment made in the Arm's Length Price to be erroneous, the Mumbai ITAT deleted the penalty u/s 271G of Income Tax Act, 1961 for non-furnishing of requisite information u/s 92D.The Bench comprising Amit Shukla (Judicial Member) and S. Rifaur Rahman (Accountant Member) observed that, “levy of penalty under section 271G of the Act is neither fair nor...
Your support helps us to bring you more content at
an affordable subscription scheme !!!
All payment options available
