Top Stories

‘The Wire’ - Jay Amit Shah Defamation Case: SC Posts Matter For Final Hearing On August 8

Mehal Jain
23 July 2018 12:53 PM GMT
‘The Wire’ - Jay Amit Shah Defamation Case: SC Posts Matter For Final Hearing On August 8
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Supreme Court has scheduled for hearing at 2 PM on August 8 the SLP preferred by ‘ The Wire ’ and journalist Rohini Singh against the judgment dated February 8 of the Gujarat High Court refusing to quash the defamation proceedings initiated by Jay Shah, son of BJP President Amit Shah in respect of an article.

 The bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A. M. Khanwilkar and D. Y. Chandrachud also directed that the interim relief granted by it, whereby the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad has been restrained from proceeding with the criminal defamation proceedings, shall continue in the meantime.

 Earlier this year, the bench had enquired whether there was any scope for settlement in the matter. Last week, the counsel for Rohini Singh and “The Wire”, Senior Advocate Raju Ramachandran, affirmed that they stood by the article published against Jay Amit Shah, and ruled out apologies.

Today, Raju Ramachandran, requested that the matter be listed for hearing on a Non-Miscellaneous Day, and submitted- “The solution Your Lordships had suggested will not work. So we need to argue the matter. The injunction (in a connected civil matter) is against us so the matter is urgent for both side.”

 It may be noted that The High Court had, in February, restored the gag order on the online news portal, barring it from reporting any article on Jay Amit Bhai Shah pending the defamation suit filed by him.

Representing Shah, Senior Advocate Neerja Kishan Kaul vehemently argued, “based on the unfounded claims levelled against my client in the article, derogatory statements are being made left, right and centre- within and outside of the Parliament His father’s pictures are being used alongside.”

Seeking to prove that the article is factually incorrect and misguiding, he aggressively advanced, “they say there are reserves of (rupees) 80 crores? I can show that there are actually losses of that amount! Even the lawyer’s reply has been selectively reproduced!”

 Questioning the integrity of the publication, he contended, “How can they speak of transparency? How can this be independent journalism when they are acting as mouthpieces of opponents?”


 Jay Amit Shah has filed the criminal complaint for defamation against “The Wire” and Rohini Singh alleging loss of reputation caused by an article “The Golden Touch of Jay Amit Shah”, which had alleged financial irregularities in the income of his company, Temple Enterprises. Shah has also filed a civil suit claiming damages worth Rs.100 crores alleging defamation by the article.

The civil court initially passed an ex-parte restraint order against publication and further discussion of the matter. Later, on December 23, 2017, the ex-parte order was vacated after hearing “The Wire”,  permitting publication of the article, but after omitting references to PM Narendra Modi.  This order was put to challenge by Jay Amit Shah before the Gujarat High Court. The High Court restored the initial gag order.

Next Story