Supreme Court Asks Patanjali To Inform If Stocks Of Products Were Recalled After Their Licenses Were Suspended; Reserves Order In Contempt Case

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (May 14) reserved verdict on the contempt proceedings pending against Patanjali Ltd, its Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna and co-founder Baba Ramdev over the publication of misleading medical advertisements in breach of a court undertaking.A bench comprising Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah passed the order, on being informed by Senior Advocate...

Calcutta High Court Judge Recuses From Hearing BJP Lok Sabha Candidate & Former Judge Abhijit Gangopadhyay's Plea For Quashing FIR, Cites Personal Relations

On Tuesday, Calcutta High Court judge Justice Jay Sengupta recused from hearing a plea by former judge and BJP Lok Sabha Candidate Abhijit Gangopadhyay seeking to quash an FIR registered against him, accusing him of attempt to murder, for allegedly assaulting protesting teachers while participating in a BJP rally at Tamluk.Justice Sengupta recused from hearing the plea upon stating that he...

Judgment Bringing Doctors Under Consumer Protection Act Requires Reconsideration : Supreme Court

In a major development, the Supreme Court on Tuesday ( May 14) said that its 1995 judgment in the case of Indian Medical Association v VP Shantha, which brought medical professionals under the Consumer Protection Act, required reconsideration. A Bench of Justices Bela Trivedi and Pankaj Mithal held so while deciding an appeal that raised the issue of whether advocates can be held...

Sandeshkhali Sting Video : Plea In Supreme Court Seeks SIT Probe To Ascertain Genuineness Of Video

An application has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking an independent investigation to ascertain the genuineness of the video of a sting operation which showed a person claiming that the false allegations of rape were raised by women in Sandeshkhali at the instance of BJP MLA Suvendhu Adhikari to cast Trinamool Congress leaders in bad light.The application has been filed by a woman...

Early Hearing Sought For Plea In Supreme Court Seeking SIT Probe Into Electoral Bonds Bribery Issue

Advocate Prashant Bhushan on Tuesday (May 14) requested the Supreme Court for an early listing of a plea seeking a probe by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) into the alleged instances of quid pro quo in the Electoral Bonds Scheme. He mentioned the matter before a bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna & Dipankar Datta (since the Chief Justice of India is not sitting today) "I had filed a...

Bhima Koregaon Case : Supreme Court Refuses To Extend Stay On Gautam Navlakha's Bail, Says Trial May Take Years To Complete

In a major development, the Supreme Court on Tuesday (May 14) granted bail to Bhima Koregaon-accused Gautam Navlakha. The same was subject to a payment of Rs 20 Lakhs for his house arrest. The Bench of Justices MM Sundresh and SVN Bhatti were hearing the National Investigative Agency's challenge against the Bombay High Court order granting bail to Bhima Navlakha. Navlakha, a journalist...

Patanjali Case : Supreme Court Refuses To Accept Apology Of Indian Medical Association President

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (May 14) expressed dissatisfaction with the apology furnished by the President of Indian Medical Association, Dr RV Asokan, for his remarks in a media interview over certain observations made by the Court.Dr Asokan, who was personally present before the Court pursuant to a notice issued on an application filed by Patanjali Ayurved seeking contempt action against...

Advocates Not Liable Under Consumer Protection Act For Deficiency Of Services : Supreme Court

In a crucial development, the Supreme Court on Tuesday (May 14) held that advocates cannot be held liable under the Consumer Protection Act 1986 (as re-enacted in 2019) for deficiency of services. The Court held that professionals have to be treated differently from persons carrying out business and trade.As a corollary, the Court held that complaints against advocates alleging deficiency...

Supreme Court Grants Bail To 2 Kerala Advocates Accused Of Raping Client

The Supreme Court granted bail on Monday(May 13) to two Kerala lawyers who were arrested by the State Police in a case for allegedly raping their client.They were granted anticipatory bail by the Kerala High Court in October 2023. Challenging the High Court's order, the victim approached the Supreme Court. In December 2023, the Supreme Court stayed the High Court's order which granted...

Can Advocate Be Held Liable Under Consumer Protection Act? Supreme Court To Deliver Its Verdict Tomorrow

The Supreme Court will deliver its judgment tomorrow(May 14) on the issue of whether advocates can be held liable under the Consumer Protection Act for deficiency of services. A Bench of Justices Bela Trivedi and Pankaj Mithal had heard the matter at length and reserved its judgment on February 26. The issue, which is relevant for members of the Bar, emerged from a judgment...

Supreme Court Issues Notice On Union's Plea Against Grant Of Bail In UAPA Case To Person Alleged To Be Foreign Citizen

The Supreme Court on Monday (May 13) issued a notice in Union's plea seeking cancellation of bail granted to the non-citizen alleged to have committed an offence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. The case relates to the grant of bail to the accused (a Srilanka Citizen as claimed by the Union) by the Madras High Court, noting the Union has no material except the...

S. 102(3) Cr.P.C. | Police Seizure Wouldn't Get Vitiated Altogether Due To Delayed Reporting To Magistrate: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Monday (May 13) observed that the delay in reporting the seizure report by the police to the magistrate wouldn't vitiate the act of seizure by police under Section 102(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.Reversing that part of the High Court's findings which had declared the seizure report to be vitiated because the report wasn't sent forthwith to the magistrate,...