Adani Cases Listing : Executive Committee Of Kerala HC Advocates Association Urges CJI To Act On Dushyant Dave's Allegations [Read Letter]

The Executive Committee of Kerala High Court Advocates Association has written to the Chief Justice of India seeking follow up action on the allegations raised by Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave regarding irregularities in the listing of cases with high commercial stakes for Adani group before the benches headed by Justice Arun Mishra. Senior Advocate George Poonthottam had placed Dave's letter before the Executive Committee on August 26 for further action. Based on that, the Executive Committee resolved on October 16 to request the Chief Justice of India to take appropriate further action in view of the "serious nature of allegations contained in the letter of Sr Advocate Dushyant Dave". If the allegations are incorrect, action should be taken against the author of the letter for the requirement of "institutional majesty", added the KHCAA.In his letter sent to CJI on August 16, Senior Advocate Dave alleged irregularities in the listing of four cases of Adani group before the benches headed by Justice Arun Mishra.'Adani Group Cases Listed Before SC Bench Violating Its Own Procedure' : Dushyant Dave Alleges In Letter To CJI [Read Letter] Dave cited two cases of Adani group, which were listed during before vacation bench during recent summer break, allegedly in violation of the SC procedure. Despite there being no special urgency in the matter, these two cases were hastily heard and disposed of by the vacation bench in May 2019, ignoring the requests for adjournments made by counsel for the parties, alleged Dave's letter.The first cited case is a 2018 civil appeal by Parsa Kenta Collieries Ltd, which is a part of Adani group, filed against a Rajasthan High Court judgment in favor of Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd (Civil Appeal 9023 of 2018). As per the letter, though the special leave for the appeal was granted only on August 24, 2018, the matter was listed during summer vacation for hearing. Dave referred to the entries stated to have been made by the Registrar R K Goel on March 14, 2019 that the case was not ready for hearing. On May 21 and 22, the bench of Justices Arun Mishra and M R Shah heard Senior Advocate Ranjit Kumar and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta in the matter and reserved judgment. "I am informed that the other counsels appearing in the matter were neither informed nor their consent was obtained for the same", Dave said. "Did the bench inquire into its urgency? Seems not. Did the bench take up other matters for hearing which were older and urgent? Seems unclear", he remarked. The second case mentioned by Dave is a 2011 civil appeal titled Adani Power (Mundra) Ltd vs Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission and others(Civil Appeal 11133 of 2011). On May 23, the same bench entertained a 2019 petition filed for early hearing of the matter, and listed the case for hearing the next day. The previous listing of the case was in February 2017. On May 24, the bench of Justices Arun Mishra, B R Gavai and Surya Kant reserved arguments in the case after hearing Senior Advocate Gopal Jain for the appellant and Senior Advocate M G Ramachandran for the respondent. Quoting Ramachandran, Dave stated that on May 23, the Advocate on Record for the respondent had made a request for not taking up the matter during the vacation citing the unavailability of the Senior Advocate who was briefed in the case. Rejecting this request, the bench listed the case for final hearing the next day. Even on May 24, a request for adjournment was made on behalf of the respondent. But the bench chose to hear the case straightaway, stated the letter. "I am told that the total benefit to this Corporate Client from these two judgments will run into thousands of crores", Dave said. He disclosed in the letter that he had appeared as a lawyer for Adani group in past, including in the case of Parsa Kenta Collieries before Rajasthan HC. "Clearly, hearing and disposal of these two appeals have been done in complete contravention of the settled practice of the Supreme Court as also its established procedure. Both these matters were listed, taken up and heard without any justification, and in hurry and in an improper manner. As a result, besides causing grave injury to public interest and public revenue, it has caused immense damage to the image of the Supreme Court and the administration of justice. It is disturbing that the Supreme Court of India should take up regular matters of a large corporate house during summer vacation in such a cavalier fashion and decide them in its favour", he said. "It raises very serious and disturbing question as to whether the Registry had sought concurrence from the Hon'ble Chief Justice for listing such matters and if not whether the Registry became party to such listing in violation of its own practise and procedure. But most of all, why were the two matters listed before the bench presided by Hon'ble Mr Justice Arun Mishra when other benches were available during ...

Adani Cases Listing : Executive Committee Of Kerala HC Advocates Association Urges CJI To Act On Dushyant Dave's Allegations [Read Letter]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Tags