Arvind Kejriwal's Challenge To ED Arrest : Live Updates From Delhi High Court Hearing

Singhvi: My learned friend doesn't describe one thing which the petition is and labels everything what it is not. It's a challenge to arrest under Section 19. By miscategorization of something, you try to make it infructuous.

Singhvi commences rebuttal submissions.

Raju: Regarding sufficiency, I've dealt it in my counter.

Raju ends his submissions. 

Raju: Scheme of approvership has been approved in crpc. Thus, the person is given protection. Otherwise they'll be no evidence.

There is a direct judgment of SC that this is not inducement. 

Raju: Kejriwal was responsible for affairs of AAP at the relevant time when kickbacks were taken and money laundering was done. There may be more than one person who is responsible for affairs of the company. Tomorrow if we have evidence, we may make others also accused. 

Raju: He takes all final decisions. He is the national convenor. Therefore he is responsible for all its affairs. Offence is committed by the company, you're responsible for the affairs.

Raju: AAP is a company under section 70 of PMLA.

Political party is a union of individuals. Therefore, now we have established that he was incharge and responsible for affairs of AAP. AAP is the whole and sole. 

Raju: You may not be a company but you will be deemed to be company if you're association of individuals. AAP is an association of individuals. Now please come to RPA. I've established that AAP is a company.

Raju refers to section 70 of PMLA.

Raju: We have established evidence shows that kickbacks was used for election campaign of AAP in Goa. Beneficiary was AAP. Offence is committed by AAP.