[Bollywood Vs Republic And Times Now] Live Updates From Delhi High Court

Nayar: Some specific persons can be impleaded

Court: Yes, I mean someone should come forward 

Court: It's a tortious act, you can get compensated during the trial. It seems like these individuals are willing to strike but unwilling to continue

Nayar: Milord, it takes courage to come this far. We're anyway seeking damages we can seek compensation also

Court: Have you claimed damages here?

Nayar: No

Court: It shows that these individuals are hesitant in claiming damages also 

Nayar: The Association Plaintiff is representing all these individuals in this suit 

Court raises the issue of 'class defamation'

'If individuals are harmed, they should come separately', the court asks plaintiffs

Court: Why haven't the individuals who claim defamation have become plaintiffs in this matter

Nayar: Milord, they are part of the plaintiff association 

Nayar summarises the grievances against defendants: There's defamation, breach to right to privacy, jeopardising personal safety, injurious falsehood, breach of the Programme Code, and parallel investigations

Akhil Sibal: All these videos are being shown on Defendants' YouTube channels. These YouTube videos must be taken down immediately 

Akhil Sibal reads out the Programme Court

'there's a statutory requirement to comply with this Code. Defendants have flagrantly violated it', he argues

Akhil Sibal: Defendants have violated the Programme Code which is binding on them