CLAT UG 2025 : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing Of Plea Against Merit List

BREAKING| CLAT-UG 2025 : Supreme Court Flags Mistakes; Directs To Give Marks For Certain Answers, Deletes Some Questions

Order: In order to put all candidates on level playing field, we direct deletion of 115. Answer to 116 being dependent on info. in 115 also directed to be deleted.

Order: WP 600/2015 is taken on board. It is informed that petitioner (Prof. Basheer) is no more. We direct it to be treated as suo motu petition. Notice be issued.

Order: We find that for answering the question, a candidate will have to undergo detailed math analysis which is not expected in an objective test. Therefore, 115 is directed to be deleted. Perusal of 116 would reveal that it is dependent on Q.115.

Order: As a corollary, 116 also ought to be deleted. We set aside direction of HC of giving marks to all students who have attempted 115. We find that on account of confusing results, many students might not have attempted to answer.

Order: We find that there is not much difference between Q.85 and 88...for the reason which led to deletion of 85, Consortium ought to have deleted 88 also. We direct deletion of Q.88. That leaves us with Q.115 and 116. The material provided was thus...

Order: We direct Consortium to give marks to students who answered as (b). Q.78 reads thus...HC has rejected contention wrt deletion of said question. We agree with HC that...we do not wish to interfere with the finding. Q.85 and 88 read thus...Consortium has deleted 85

Order: contract would be voidable when minor who has signed it rejects the same. We find that without prior knowledge of law, only logical answer that would flow is answer key (b). We therefore set aside HC direction deleting question 77.

Order: that unless there was prior knowledge of law, it was not possible to give correct answer...it is revealed that if a student applies reason and logic, he would understand difference between void and voidable contract

Order: given answer as answer key (b). HC has directed to delete the said question while giving markings to students. It is sought to be urged by some of the respondent-candidates that for answering said question

Order: We therefore direct Consortium to give positive marking to all students who have opted for (c) or (d)...those who have answered a/b, be given negative marking. Q.77 reads thus...according to Consortium, by applying reason and logic, a student could have...

Order: We are amazed that this stand is taken by experts in field of legal education. This Court has emphasized duty of citizens to protect natural resources. We find that answer key (c) is also correct.