"Those Who Made Hate Speeches Are Out On Bail; And The Person Who Exposed Them Is In Jail; What Has This Country Become?" : Colin Gonsalves In Zubair's Case

"The persons who made hate speech, they have been released on bail. And the person who exposed them, he is in jail. What this country has become?", submitted Senior Advocate Colin Gonsalves before the Supreme Court on Friday seeking to quash the UP Police FIR against Mohammed Zubair, co-founder of fact checking website AltNews.The FIR was registered by Sitapur police over a tweet made by Zubair in which he described three Hindu religious leaders Yati Narasinghanand Saraswati, Bajrang Muni and Anand Swaroop as 'Hate mongers'.Gonsalves submitted that Zubair was merely reporting the hate-speeches made by these persons and inviting the attention of police authorities to their statements.He argued that the FIR was originally registered for offences under Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code for offending religious sentiments and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act for transmission of obscene materials. The tweet was not insulting religion. Also, there was nothing obscene about it, the senior counsel added."This is my tweet - "Well done Vineet Jain, why do you need hatemongers like...when you have anchors like....". They have arrested people for hate speech. They have been released on bail. And hate speech started again. I have not spoken against any religion. Where is the crime against religion? Now see, the persons who made hate speech have been released. And I who tweeted this, a secular person, is in jail. These persons have been arrested by police for hate speech and released on bail. When I call them hatemongers, I am not wrong", Gonsalves submitted.He said that Zubair is one of the founders of AltNews, which is a reputed organization performing fact checking. He added that AltNews has been recommended for Nobel Peace Prize this year.Gonsalves : The persons who made hate speech, they have been released on bail. And the person who exposed them, he is in jail. What this country has become?#MohammedZubair #SupremeCourt #AltNews— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) July 8, 2022 When the Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta informed the bench that the police has dropped the offence under Section 67 IT Act and has added Section 153A IPC(promotion of communal disharmony) in the case, Gonsalves argued that even that offence is not made out."If I am performing the role of pointing out hate speech and reporting to police, it is not promoting enmity between religions. I am promoting secularism in fact. 153A does not apply at all. I am telling them to stop promoting enmity, stop hate speech", Gonsalves submitted.Gonsalves submitted that Zubair had only tweeted a video of Bajrang Muni's speech in which he had made threats of kidnap and rape against Muslim women. Gonsalves submitted that Zubair was reporting hate speech by tweeting the video and tagged Sitapur Police in the tweet seeking criminal action.He also questioned the need for seizing Zubair's laptop and mobile phone when he is not denying the authorship of the tweet.Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, appearing for the investigating officer in the FIR registered at Sitapur Police Station, argued that the offences under Section 295A and 153A of the Indian Penal Code (for offending religious sentiments and promotion communal disharmony respectively), were prima facie made out against Zubair.The ASG contended that Zubair was "inciting violence" by tweeting the speech."My learned friend says he has written to the police station. No, he is tweeting it. And everybody comes to know about it. He is inciting violence", the ASG submitted."Bajrang Muni is a respected mahant...a religious leader in Sitapur with large following. When you call a religious leader hate-monger, it raises problems.My learned friend says he has written to the police. That is wrong. He is tweeting it to the larger world.You have outraged the religious feelings of large number of followers of Bajrangi Baba. Whether it is deliberate or not, is a matter for trial. Prima facie offence is made out", the ASG submitted."You are attempting to promote on grounds of religion disharmony or ill-will between different kinds of people. Calling a religious leader a hate-monger! If you were such a nice person, you could have sent a letter to police. Why did you tweet?", the ASG continued.In response, Gonsalves submitted that he was merely reporting the speech made by Bajrang Muni. He cited a report of the Hindustan Times about the National Commission for Women taking suo motu cognizance of the speech and writing to the UP DGP seeking action. "NCW has also written seeking appropriate measures from police to curb people from using such outrageous language for women and not be a mute spectator in such incidents," Gonsalves quoted from the report.With respect to Yati Narsinghanand, Gonsalves submitted that he was arrested in hate speech cases and that the Attorney General for India has granted sanction for initiating contempt of court proceedings against him for his remarks about the Supreme Court."Am I...

"Those Who Made Hate Speeches Are Out On Bail; And The Person Who Exposed Them Is In Jail; What Has This Country Become?" : Colin Gonsalves In Zubair's Case

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

"Those Who Made Hate Speeches Are Out On Bail; And The Person Who Exposed Them Is In Jail; What Has This Country Become?" : Colin Gonsalves In Zubair's Case

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers