Dying Declaration Can't Be Discarded Merely Because There Was No Extreme Emergency When It Was Recorded : Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a dying declaration cannot be discarded merely because there was no extreme emergency or danger to the life of the victim at the time when it was recorded."...there is no absolute proposition of law that in a case when at the time when the dying declaration was recorded, there was no emergency and/or any danger to the life, the dying declaration should be discarded as a whole", the Court observed referring to the precedent Laxman v State of Maharashtra (2002) 6 SCC 710.In the instant case, the dying declaration of the victim was recorded on December 5, 1980, before the Additional City Magistrate. It was a month after the recording the dying declaration that the victim died(January 4, 1981). Pointing out to this aspect, the accused argued that the dying declaration was not reliable as there was no apprehension of death at the time of its recording.A bench comprising Justices MR Shah and BV Nagarathna discarded this argument. The bench noted that the victim had suffered a stab injury and there was possibility of danger to his life and hence the dying declaration was recorded as a matter of prudence.The Court also added that merely because the weapon used is not recovered cannot be a ground not to rely upon the dying declaration.The accused Subash @ Pappu was convicted by the Trial Court under Section 302 IPC and Section 148 IPC. Allowing his appeal, the Allahabad High Court acquitted him. The State of Uttar Pradesh approached the Apex Court challenging this acquittal.While considering the appeal, the bench noted that though the accused was not specifically charged for the offence under Section 302 r/w Section 149 IPC, ingredients for the offence under Section 302 r/w Section 149 and Section 148 of IPC were specifically brought to the notice of the accused. Therefore, at the most, it can be said to be a defective framing of the charge by not specifically charging under Section 149 IPC, the bench noted.The non-framing of a charge under Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code would not vitiate the conviction in the absence of any prejudice caused to the accused.If ingredients of the section are obvious or implicit in the charge framed then conviction in regard thereto can be sustained, irrespective of the fact that said section has not been mentioned, the bench noted.Partly allowing the appeal, the court held that the accused cannot be convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC r/w Section 149 IPC taking note of the fact that the deceased died due to septicemia after a period of thirty days. Instead, accused was held guilty for the offence under Section 304 Part I r/w Section 149 IPC and for the offence under Section 148 IPC.Case detailsState of Uttar Pradesh vs Subhash @ Pappu | 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 336 | CrA 436 OF 2022 | 1 April 2022Coram: Justices MR Shah and BV NagarathnaCounsel: Sr. Adv Garima Prasad for appellant- State, Adv Deepak Goel for the respondentHeadnotesCode of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ; Section 464 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 ; Section 149 - Mere non-framing of a charge under Section 149 on face of charges framed against appellant would not vitiate the conviction in the absence of any prejudice caused to them - Mere defect in language, or in narration or in the form of charge would not render conviction unsustainable, provided the accused is not prejudiced thereby - If ingredients of the section are obvious or implicit in the charge framed then conviction in regard thereto can be sustained, irrespective of the fact that said section has not been mentioned. [Referred to Annareddy Sambasiva Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, (2009) 12 SCC 546] (Para 7)Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ; Section 32 - Dying Declaration - There is no absolute proposition of law that in a case when at the time when the dying declaration was recorded, there was no emergency and/or any danger to the life, the dying declaration should be discarded as a whole (Para 6) - Merely because the weapon used is not recovered cannot be a ground not to rely upon the dying declaration. (Para 9)Indian Penal Code, 1860 ; Section 148 - Merely because three persons were chargesheeted/charged/tried and even out of three tried, two persons came to be acquitted cannot be a ground to not to convict the accused under Section 148 IPC when involvement of six to seven persons in commission of the offence has been established and proved. (Para 12)Summary - Appeal against judgment of Allahabad HC which acquitted accused by setting aside conviction recorded by Trial Court under Section 302 and 148 IPC - Partly allowed - Accused convicted under Section 304 Part I r/w Section 149 IPC and for the offence under Section 148 IPC.Click here to Read/Download Judgment

Dying Declaration Can't Be Discarded Merely Because There Was No Extreme Emergency When It Was Recorded : Supreme Court

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Tags