ED v Mamata Banerjee : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

24 March 2026 11:36 AM IST

  • ED v Mamata Banerjee : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing
    Listen to this Article

    The Supreme Court to hear today ED's writ petition alleging that West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee and state police officers obstructed its search of the office of I-PAC, the political consultant of All India Trinamool Congress.

    A Bench of Justices PK Mishra and Justice NV Anjaria will hear the matter.

    Last week, the State opposed the maintainability of the writ petition, contending that allowing a central government department to file writ petition against a state government will be dangerous to the federal structure.

    Follow this page for live updates from the hearing.

    Live Updates

    • 24 March 2026 12:48 PM IST

      J Mishra: please concentrate on the fundamental rights of the officers of the ED with whom the offence has been committed. If you only concentrate on ED, ED, ED and forget the second petition which is preferred by the individual officers who were the victim of that offence

    • 24 March 2026 12:42 PM IST

      Sibal: at this point the violation of fundamental right cannot be assumed. Only after there is an investigation and if the investigation is not moving forward then they can say that fundamental right is being violated

    • 24 March 2026 12:41 PM IST

      Sibal: there is a statutory remedy that statutory remedy has to be followed. I am not on maintainability now. If an offence is committed within the jurisdiction of a particular police station in a particular state then the investigation has to be done by the state. Even if there is a violation of fundamental rights

    • 24 March 2026 12:40 PM IST

      Sibal: assuming the offences by ED are committed what is the fundamental right to move this quote. Let's assume a person is kidnapped. If he is released, he can't move under article 32? These offences cannot be investigated by an authority outside the police station. As per BNSS an offence committed within a particular area has under the law to be investigated by that police station.

    • 24 March 2026 12:36 PM IST

      J Mishra: There are two distinct offences while PMLA is going on PMLA officers have not unearthed or come across some other offence. The present offences are committed by some other persons against PMLA investigators

    • 24 March 2026 12:35 PM IST

      J Mishra: Section 66 PMLA may not apply. There are two distinct allegations. PMLA allegations which ED is enquiring. Then the second set of offence which the petitioners herein are alleging that has not been committed in continuation of or while the investigation of PMLA offence was undergoing.

    • 24 March 2026 12:32 PM IST

      Sibal: if ED is investigating under PMLA and some other offence has come to the notice of the officers then the concerned agency, in this case state government, should be informed as per section 66 of PMLA

    • 24 March 2026 12:29 PM IST

      Sibal: your lordships are assuming that the CM has committed offence.

      J Mishra: we are not assuming anything that is the allegation. Do not mistake us. Every allegation is based on some facts, if there are no facts there is no need to be investigated. That is what thet are praying for, for CBI to investigate

    • 24 March 2026 12:27 PM IST

      J Mishra: the CM barges into an ED investigation and your idea of remedy for the ED is to go to the state government which is headed by the CM and inform them about it and seek remedy

    • 24 March 2026 12:20 PM IST

      Sibal: Further they say that the case being investigated by state police cannot be investigated by state police. This is covered by several judgements of this court. They have a remedy and they should not file an article 32 petition.

    Next Story