Gujarat Riots : Mukul Rohatgi Defends SIT Clean Chit To Narendra Modi - Live Updates From Zakia Jafri's Case In Supreme Court Hearing

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

24 Nov 2021 5:11 AM GMT

  • Gujarat Riots : Mukul Rohatgi Defends SIT Clean Chit To Narendra Modi - Live Updates From Zakia Jafris Case In Supreme Court  Hearing

    Supreme Court to continue hearing today the petition filed by Zakia Jafri challenging the SIT's clean chit to the then Gujarat CM Narendra Modi & other high functionaries in the #GujaratRiots of 2002.A Bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and CT Ravikumar is hearing the matter. Taking the Court through a range of voluminous documents and notes, Senior Advocate...

    Supreme Court to continue hearing today the petition filed by Zakia Jafri challenging the SIT's clean chit to the then Gujarat CM Narendra Modi & other high functionaries in the #GujaratRiots of 2002.

    A Bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and CT Ravikumar is hearing the matter.

     Taking the Court through a range of voluminous documents and notes, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal concluded his arguments on behalf of the Petitioner yesterday. Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi will argue for SIT today,

    On Tuesday, Senior Advocate, Mr. Kapil Sibal appearing for the Petitioner, vehemently argued that the SIT that had given clean chit to the highest functionaries of the State of Gujarat, who were alleged to have been involved in the Gujarat riots of 2002, did not conduct proper investigation and the Magistrate and the Gujarat High Court did not deal with crucial material, refusing to delve further into the matter.

    Stay On This Page For Live Updates


    Live Updates

    • 24 Nov 2021 9:50 AM GMT

      Rohatgi: Now Milord see 261 top. This is about parading (dead bodies from Godhra to Ahmedabad). I have given synopsis to your lordship of this parading. Now see what they have done. I want to read this.  

    • 24 Nov 2021 9:50 AM GMT

      Rohatgi: Jaydeep Patel and Kodnani accused in Naroda Gaam, trial is going on. Babu convicted in Pateya and facing trial in Gaam. This Erda was a Police officer, was chargesheeted, but acquitted.

    • 24 Nov 2021 9:50 AM GMT

      Rohatgi: So, what they have done is wherever there are general paragraphs, they have culled it out. Now 245 para b, the paragraphs are verbatim from the affidavits of Shreekumar.

      Rohatgi: Para h, Kodnani, Jaydeep and Babu and Erda are chargesheeted and tried. Kodnani was arrested, was convicted in Naroda Pateya. If SIT was partisan then would not have arrested a sitting Minister.

    • 24 Nov 2021 9:35 AM GMT

      Rohatgi: In Para 8, we have culled out allegations of people in govt. We examined all these people. At the bottom you will find the allegation why did you not take action on Shreekumar’s affidavit.

      Rohatgi: We have culled out some 30-40 allegation. Kindly see 14, unkind and untrue allegation on deployment of army. item 15 is Pro VHP PPs. The SIT has paraphrased every allegation made. I am not reading, but kindly note that they (SIT) had culled out some 30 allegations.

    • 24 Nov 2021 9:32 AM GMT

      Rohatgi: What did the police do wrong? They said, come and record the statement and the same you be placed before the judge.

    • 24 Nov 2021 9:29 AM GMT

      Rohatgi: Kindly turn to 236, your lordship will find the background.

      Mr. Rohatgi emphasized that when Zakia appeared before Mahapatra, she was not ready to make a statement until her complaint was registered as FIR.

    • 24 Nov 2021 9:23 AM GMT

      Rohatgi: This is the flavour of the complaint and everything Mr. Sibal has argued is not here. Because it was the mandate of the SC, see to what extent the SIT goes (to investigate). 

    • 24 Nov 2021 9:23 AM GMT

      Rohatgi: My juniors are saying it(allegations) is cut copy. This goes on and on till Mr. Murmu. Just mark Shreekumar, Rahul Sharma. Sanjeev Bhat or that meeting of political honchos of 27, my friend chooses not to say anything, so I will also not say anything.

    • 24 Nov 2021 9:16 AM GMT

      Rohatgi: Each one of these fellows were examined by the SIT. In the hindsight one would say why do you examine when no allegation. Here accusation is general and now it is becoming specific.

      Rohatgi: The accusation is that because you are VHP. Now, Babu Bajrangi. He is convicted and facing trial in another case and stung by the operation. He wears three caps.

    • 24 Nov 2021 9:15 AM GMT

      Rohatgi: pg 101 - allegation against each of the accused. All of them were completely general. Kindly see, Anil Patel became a minister later, he was a business man at the time of the riots.

    Next Story