Gujarat Riots- Zakia Jafri's Plea Against Clean Chit To Narendra Modi- LIVE UPDATES From Supreme Court

Sibal: So, Milords, now he (Rayiz) is appearing in all cases against us. I just wanted to show his conduct. He is their stock witness in all cases.

Rohatgi: I would want to respond to the note (Mr. Sibal’s note).

Bench: We will continue tomorrow, then.

Sibal: I wanted to point out about Rayiz Khan. Kindly come to the table in 109. This Rayiz Khan was in our employment, we got protection for Rayiz Khan from this Court. Then his services were terminated.

Sibal: Tutoring witness is not the same as guiding a witness. The injured witnesses were in such a state of mind that they needed (guidance).

Bench: SIT did not comment on the Petitioner.

Sibal: He did briefly comment and then allowed the State to do that.

Sibal: She (Teesta) is not seeking any personal relief. She was doing it openly, not secretly.

Sibal: If the victims feel that the State has not been fair to them what is wrong with that. This means every victim who act against the state would be characterised in this fashion. What is the sinister agenda? I was working with NHRC.

Sibal: Is it illegal to help a widow, who has no recourse to justice? In fact S. 39 of the CrPC makes it a duty. S 302,303,304. It is duty to give these information to Court under S. 39.

Bench: We made it clear that all those facts [in Guj HC judgment] were not relevant in this case.

Mr. Sibal reads from his note that the challenge to the locus of petitioner no. 2 is based on unsubstantiated allegations in a judgment of Guj HC.

Bench: We made it clear when he was arguing, that we will not give opinion on other proceedings. We will not record finding on those proceedings.