'We Are Concerned About Broadcasts Which Incite Violence' : Supreme Court Seeks Clarity From Centre On Powers Under Cable TV Act

The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Central Government about its powers under Cable TV Networks(Regulation) Act 1994 to control broadcast of content (by electronic media), that has a tendency to incite violence. "We aren't concerned so much with what people are saying, people say anything these days.We are concerned with situations that may create violence and lead to loss of property and life", a Bench led by CJI SA Bobde said while hearing a batch of petitions seeking action against news reports which communalised the Tablighi Jamaat event. The Petitioners in this case had alleged that certain sections of the media used "Communal headlines" and "bigoted statements" to demonise and blame the entire Muslim community of deliberately spreading the corona virus across the country, in the backdrop of the Tablighi Jamat event in New Delhi. The CJI today asked the Central Government about its powers under the Cable TV Network Regulation Act and Program Code to prevent broadcast of inciteful content and avert any law and order situation. "We are concerned about broadcasts which incite violence", remarked the CJI. It may be noted that the Government has powers under Sections 19 and 20 of the Cable TV Act to regulate or prohibit the transmission or re-transmission of any channel or programme for public order.At this juncture, the Solicitor General submitted that the Government can stop broadcast of objectionable content and he will bring on record the details of instances where the Government has exercised its powers under the Act. The SG said that there is a group under the Ministry to monitor broadcast content for violations of the Programme Code. The bench also opined that there is an ambiguity in Section 19 (Power to prohibit transmission of certain programmes in public interest) of the Cable TV Act inasmuch as it is not clear if it will include "broadcaster" or only a cable TV network.The bench observed that the amendment adding the definition of 'broadcaster' in the Cable TV Act does not reflect in the penal provisions of Section 19 and 20.The Solicitor General replied that he will look into the issue of ambiguity and will file an affidavit. The Court has granted three weeks' time to the Respondents to filed their affidavits in the matter. Delete The Court asks if Section 19 of the Cable TV Act will include "broadcaster" or only a cable TV network.CJI-led bench observes there is an ambiguity.— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) January 28, 2021 Hate Speech, Media Trial, Vilification : When Media Excesses Came Under Scrutiny In 2020Background The Supreme Court had earlier expressed inclination to make solid, long-term measures about news items and had asked the Central Government about the action taken against errant media outlets, under the Cable TV Network (Regulation) Act, 1995. In November 2020, CJI Bobde expressed strong displeasure over the counter-affidavit filed by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. "We are not satisfied with your affidavit. We had asked you to tell us what have you done under the Cable TV Act? There is no whisper about that in the affidavit. We must tell you that we are disappointed with the Union's affidavit in these matters. … Why should we refer to NBSA etc when you have the authority to look into it. If it does not exist, then you create an authority, else we will hand it over to an outside agency?" the CJI had remarked.In the second affidavit filed after the court's criticism, the Centre stated that the media reports of the Tablighi Jamaat issue have been "largely factual" and "objective" by mentioning of instances of good reporting by certain media outlets. After referring to only the factual and objective media reports about the Tablighi Jamaat issue, the Centre denied that there was communal reporting of the matter. The Ministry blamed that the petitioners were making "vague assertions based upon certain "fact checking news reports" to contend that the entire media is perpetrating communal harmony and hatred towards one particular community..."The Court expressed serious disappointment at the second affidavit as well."We are not satisfied with your affidavit. We had asked you to tell us what have you done under the Cable TV Act? There is no whisper about that in the affidavit. We must tell you that we are disappointed with the Union's affidavit in these matters", the Chief Justice of India, S A Bobde, told the Solicitor General, Tushar Mehta.The Petitioners in this case alleged that the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting had failed in its duty to give equal protection of the law to all persons in India under Article 14 of the Constitution by allowing the media to present facts in a twisted manner, using phrases that were prejudicial to the Muslim community.Furthermore, it was averred that such reporting is in clear violation of Rule 6 of the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994...

'We Are Concerned About Broadcasts Which Incite Violence' : Supreme Court Seeks Clarity From Centre On Powers Under Cable TV Act

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

'We Are Concerned About Broadcasts Which Incite Violence' : Supreme Court Seeks Clarity From Centre On Powers Under Cable TV Act

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers