[Hearing On Andhra Govt's Plea Against HC 's Stay Order On SIT Probe In Amaravati Land Case][Live Updates From Supreme Court]

Justice Bhushan lists the case after 4 weeks.

Justice Bhushan: Issue notice as well as on petition for interim relief. Respondent may also file counter affidavit. Liberty to file additional documents granted.

Dave urges the Court to issue notice and make it returnable.

“Ld. Judge had gone against a catena of judgements which have been decided by My Lords,” he adds

Even though Writs were listed for admissions, very extensive arguments were advanced, the judgment says... if this was so, the Court goes ahead and admits the Plea. No facts, no material and disputed questions of fact were put forth, Dave

Six months the Cabinet Committee reviewed everything and in the meanwhile, the Government feels if allegations are made against us, CBI may conduct investigations, says Dave

“In this case the HC has interdicted a probe and even registration of a case. Can this be allowed? Is this how a high court can function?” Says Dave

“In this case the HC has interdicted a probe and even registration of a case. Can this be allowed? Is this how a high court can function?” Says Dave

HC does not have such extraordinary powers. They are bound by My lords Court, says Dave

He cites judgments to substantiate his arguments

Has the Government decided to review all decisions of the TDP Government? asks Justice Bhushan

"Not at all..only those cases where gross illegalities are found," Dave responds.

Have you made representation to the Centre, Justice Bhushan asks.

Yes, but no reply received yet, Dave says.

Impleaded Central Agencies? Justice Bhushan asks

Impleadment applications for ED and Union of India were dismissed, petitioners counsel says