Hijab Ban- Supreme Court Hearing- DAY-8 Live Updates

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

20 Sep 2022 4:45 AM GMT

  • Hijab Ban- Supreme Court Hearing- DAY-8 Live Updates

    Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia will hear a batch of petitions challenging the ban on wearing Hijab in educational institutions in Karnataka.A batch of 23 petitions is listed before the bench. Some of them are writ petitions filed directly before the Supreme Court seeking the right to wear hijab for Muslim girl students. Some others are special...

    Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia will hear a batch of petitions challenging the ban on wearing Hijab in educational institutions in Karnataka.

    A batch of 23 petitions is listed before the bench. Some of them are writ petitions filed directly before the Supreme Court seeking the right to wear hijab for Muslim girl students. Some others are special leave petitions which challenge the judgment of the Karnataka High Court dated March 15 which upheld the hijab ban.

    The SLPs have been filed against the judgment dated March 15 passed DAY 6by the High Court of Karnataka, upholding Government Order dated 05.02.2022, which has effectively prohibited Petitioners, and other such female Muslim students from wearing the headscarf in their Pre-University Colleges. A Full Bench of the High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit and Justice JM Khazi held that wearing of hijab by women was not an essential religious practice of Islam. The Bench further held the prescription of uniform dress code in educational institutions was not violative of the fundamental rights of the petitioners.

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 2

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 3

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 4

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 5

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 6

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 7

    FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES OF TODAY'S HEARING HERE:

    Live Updates

    • 20 Sep 2022 9:53 AM GMT

      SG : High Court could have avoided.

      Justice Dhulia : High Court should not have gone into it. They have relied on a term paper of a student, and they have not gone to the original text. Other side is giving another commentary. Who will decide which commentary is right?

    • 20 Sep 2022 9:53 AM GMT

      SG : Suppose somebody killed my brother and I believes that he cannot rest in peace unless I take revenge, murder cannot be essential religious practice.

    • 20 Sep 2022 9:50 AM GMT

      SG : Kindly see the speech of Dr.Ambedkar. He possible foresaw that....Dr Ambedkar says the protection is for rights which are essentially religious.

    • 20 Sep 2022 9:49 AM GMT

      SG : This is interpretation of Quran, I respect that. But there can be another interpretation for a religious text.

    • 20 Sep 2022 9:49 AM GMT

      Adv Shamshad says he has a one page submission which will clarify the court's doubts.

      Justice Gupta asks him to hand over the submission.

    • 20 Sep 2022 9:47 AM GMT

      SG : Anything done can be included in faith...then there won't be any systematic uniformity in society.

      Pasha : It is not amorphous, it is defined.

      SG : High Court should not have gone into this, it is a matter of uniform.

    • 20 Sep 2022 9:47 AM GMT

      Justice Gupta : I read the Kerala judgment, Kerala judgment says it is part of Shariat law. Are we deciding by Shariat law? Is my reading correct

    • 20 Sep 2022 9:46 AM GMT

      Pasha : Iman is the pillar of the Islam..faith in the scriptures is the essential, faith in Allah, faith in judgment, that is the first pillar...

    • 20 Sep 2022 9:46 AM GMT

      Justice Gupta : Mr.Pasha has pointed out 5 essential parts of Islam..

      SG : Hijab is not one of them.

    • 20 Sep 2022 9:41 AM GMT

      SG : In some countries, women are not allowed to drive. I am not criticizing any religion. In Iran, there is a lady pilot, but from house, her husband has to drive her.

    Next Story