Hijab Ban : No Religious Dress In Colleges During Pendency Of Case, Says Karnataka High Court| LIVE UPDATES [Day 3]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

10 Feb 2022 8:45 AM GMT

  • Hijab Ban : No Religious Dress In Colleges During Pendency Of Case, Says Karnataka High Court| LIVE UPDATES [Day 3]

    A Full Bench of the Karnataka High Court will hear petitions filed by Muslim students challenging Hijab Ban in colleges at 2.30 PM today.A single bench had referred the petitions to larger bench yesterday observing that "questions of seminal importance" are involved.The single bench also said that the question of interim relief will be considered by the larger bench.The matter is before a...

    A Full Bench of the Karnataka High Court will hear petitions filed by Muslim students challenging Hijab Ban in colleges at 2.30 PM today.

    A single bench had referred the petitions to larger bench yesterday observing that "questions of seminal importance" are involved.

    The single bench also said that the question of interim relief will be considered by the larger bench.

    The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.

    Stay on this page for live-updates from the hearing.


    Live Updates

    • 10 Feb 2022 10:58 AM GMT

      Kamat : Ultimately, what the Court held is that a private minority institution cannot be forced to allow this.

    • 10 Feb 2022 10:54 AM GMT

      Kamat says that the GO is based on weak foundation. He now takes the bench to the decisions cited in the GO. The first one is the Kerala HC judgment which refused to permit a Muslim student to wear head scarf in a pvt school.

    • 10 Feb 2022 10:53 AM GMT

      Chief Justice : They are saying their understanding..Come to operative portion. The institutions or persons on whom it is binding they have to go by operative portion of GO.

    • 10 Feb 2022 10:52 AM GMT

      Kamat : GO issued on Feb 5 suffers from total non application of mind. The three judgements relied on by GO to say that wearing of Hijab is not a fundamental right shows a complete non-application of mind. All these three decisions are totally against the state.

    • 10 Feb 2022 10:49 AM GMT

      Kamat begins submissions : I will be very brief and my arguments will be for considering interim relief. These are students who have been going to college wearing head scarf till Feb 3 when they were stopped and told unless you remove your head scarf you cannot go in.

    • 10 Feb 2022 10:47 AM GMT

      Hegde : In this case there should be interim orders which will protect the rights of the petitioners to attend the 3 months of college.

      Hegde concludes. 

    • 10 Feb 2022 10:46 AM GMT

      Hegde points out that the Motor Vehicles Rules exempt Sikhs who wear turbans from the requirement of helmet while riding bikes. Similarly, in the Supreme Court rules, there are provisions for pardansashin women.

    • 10 Feb 2022 10:46 AM GMT

      Hegde :  There is prima facie case, and a balance of convenience in my favour, denial to attend college will have serious consequences.

    • 10 Feb 2022 10:45 AM GMT

      Hegde: In the fact of our cases, this is a govt institution, which belongs to every inhabitant of Karnataka and citizens of India. Can you by a rule make a set of citizens forsake their essential tenets of religion?

    • 10 Feb 2022 10:44 AM GMT

      Hegde refers to the second judgment of the Kerala HC which refused to allow head scarf in a school. Hegde says it was a private minority institution and the situation is distinguishable. 

    Next Story