Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing (Day 8)- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

22 Feb 2022 2:07 PM IST

  • Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing (Day 8)- LIVE UPDATES

    Karnataka High Court Full Bench will continue hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the hijab ban in educational institutions.The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.On Monday, Chief Justice sought a clarification from the State regarding its stand on banning hijab....

    Live Updates

    • 22 Feb 2022 4:02 PM IST

      AG: There was an argument on Article 15. There is no discrimination on grounds of religion. These are bald allegations without any substance and we deny them.

    • 22 Feb 2022 4:01 PM IST

      AG: A right cannot be exercised in islotation in public spaces. Institutional discipline is paramount.

      In military service somebody had sought enforcement of individual rights. This was for growing of a beard. The court negatived.

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:59 PM IST

      AG refers to privacy judgment: "The notion that there must exist a reasonable expectation of privacy ensures that while on one hand, individual has a protected zone of privacy, yet on the other, exercise of individual choices is subject to rights of others to lead orderly lives"

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:57 PM IST

      AG: I will repeat. There is no prohibition of hijab anywhere. But it cannot be compulsory, it should be left to the choice of the women concerned.

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:56 PM IST

      AG : Dignity involves liberty; liberty involves choice. The entire submission of petitioners is based on compulsion.The entire claim of petition is to make compulsion, it goes against fundamental ethos of constitution.

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:56 PM IST

      ...the fundamental duties of every citizen.We cannot adopt an interpretation of the Constitution which has such an effect. Our inability to state this as a matter of constitutional doctrine is liable to lead us to positions of pretence or, worse still, hypocrisy"

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:55 PM IST

      AG continues quoting J Chandrachud from Sabarimala judgment :

      "To treat women as children of a lesser god is to blink at the Constitution itself....To allow practices derogatory to the dignity of a woman in matters of faith & worship would permit a conscious breach of

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:54 PM IST

      "...India’s unwavering commitment to a constitutional order based on human. Practices which are destructive of liberty & those which make some citizens less equal than others can simply not be countenanced"

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:54 PM IST

      AG refers to a paragraph from J Chandrachud's judgment in Sabarimala case:

      "Once individual dignity assumes the character of a shining star in the constellation of fundamental rights, the place of religion in public places must be conditioned by

    • 22 Feb 2022 3:52 PM IST

      AG : Kindly keep my submission that woman cannot be subjected to a compulsion of a dress in the context of their submissions.

    Next Story