Hijab Ban- Supreme Court Hearing- DAY-7 Live Updates

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

19 Sep 2022 7:28 AM GMT

  • Hijab Ban- Supreme Court Hearing- DAY-7 Live Updates

    Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia will hear a batch of petitions challenging the ban on wearing Hijab in educational institutions in Karnataka.A batch of 23 petitions is listed before the bench. Some of them are writ petitions filed directly before the Supreme Court seeking the right to wear hijab for Muslim girl students. Some others are special...

    Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia will hear a batch of petitions challenging the ban on wearing Hijab in educational institutions in Karnataka.

    A batch of 23 petitions is listed before the bench. Some of them are writ petitions filed directly before the Supreme Court seeking the right to wear hijab for Muslim girl students. Some others are special leave petitions which challenge the judgment of the Karnataka High Court dated March 15 which upheld the hijab ban.

    The SLPs have been filed against the judgment dated March 15 passed DAY 6by the High Court of Karnataka, upholding Government Order dated 05.02.2022, which has effectively prohibited Petitioners, and other such female Muslim students from wearing the headscarf in their Pre-University Colleges. A Full Bench of the High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit and Justice JM Khazi held that wearing of hijab by women was not an essential religious practice of Islam. The Bench further held the prescription of uniform dress code in educational institutions was not violative of the fundamental rights of the petitioners.

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 1

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 2

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 3

    LIVE UPDATES- DAY 4

    LIVE UPDATES-DAY 5

    LIVE UPDATES-DAY 6


    FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES OF TODAY'S HEARING HERE

    Live Updates

    • 19 Sep 2022 9:56 AM GMT

      Dave : High Court says (fundamental duty) under Article 51A is more important. It cannot override fundemantal rights under 14, 19, 21 and 25.

      Quotes from Minerva Mills case.

    • 19 Sep 2022 9:55 AM GMT

      Dave says he has immense respect for Maharaja of Baroda Sayajirao Gaekwad II who sponsored Dr.Ambedkar's education. He adds the Maharaja initiated many reforms like girls education. Emphasises that he made a law against Water Pollution in 1920s.

    • 19 Sep 2022 9:55 AM GMT

      Dave quotes Ambedkar speech "Bhakti in religion may be a road to the salvation of the soul. But in politics, Bhakti or hero-worship is a sure road to degradation and to eventual dictatorship" and says he was making veiled reference to Gandhi and Nehru

    • 19 Sep 2022 9:50 AM GMT

      Dave : Probably, Dr.Ambedkar was making a veiled attack against Nehru. He had reservations against Gandhi and Nehru.

      Justice Dhulia : Not against Nehru, it came later, during the Hindu Code bill. Nehru brought Ambedkar as the law minister.

    • 19 Sep 2022 9:50 AM GMT

      Dave says that when the first draft of the Constitution came, which was approved by Pt Nehru, it had no provision for enforcing. Dr.Ambedkar said what is the point if rights can't be enforced and that is how Article 32 and 226 were inserted.

    • 19 Sep 2022 9:49 AM GMT

      Dave refers to Article 25 - says the words used are "freely practice, profess and propagate" religion. The word "religious practice" comes only in 25(2), which is not relevant in this case.

    • 19 Sep 2022 9:45 AM GMT

      Justice Gupta : Whatever the judgments I have seen, they are talking about religious practice inside the religious places..

      Dave : That is restricting too much.

    • 19 Sep 2022 9:43 AM GMT

      Justice Gupta : What is meant by religious practice?

      Dave : Your lordships have held what the community believes, what the individual believes as the religious practice.

    • 19 Sep 2022 9:43 AM GMT

      Dave : The High Court judgment has gone on and on about essential religious practice.

    • 19 Sep 2022 9:42 AM GMT

      Dave : The theory of essential religious practice is wholly irrelevant. And this essential religious practice test has been doubted in 1960s...that in Shirur Mutt, the Court never really said essential religious practice.

      Justice Dhulia : It was in the context of Article 26

    Next Story