Karnataka Hijab Ban: Supreme Court Hearing DAY-4 -LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

12 Sep 2022 7:37 AM GMT

  • Karnataka Hijab Ban: Supreme Court Hearing DAY-4 -LIVE UPDATES

    Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia will hear a batch of petitions challenging the ban on wearing Hijab in educational institutions in Karnataka.A batch of 23 petitions is listed before the bench. Some of them are writ petitions filed directly before the Supreme Court seeking the right to wear hijab for Muslim girl students. Some others are special...

    Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia will hear a batch of petitions challenging the ban on wearing Hijab in educational institutions in Karnataka.

    A batch of 23 petitions is listed before the bench. Some of them are writ petitions filed directly before the Supreme Court seeking the right to wear hijab for Muslim girl students. Some others are special leave petitions which challenge the judgment of the Karnataka High Court dated March 15 which upheld the hijab ban.

    So far, the bench has heard Senior Advocate Devadatt Kamat for the petitioners who argued that the Government Order, banning Hijabs in educational institutions violates students' fundamental rights under Article 19, 21 and 25 of the Constitution.

    During the course of hearing, the bench has also raised several queries like whether religious clothing can be worn in a government run institution in a secular country. The bench also asked the counsels whether if it is held that freedom of expression includes the freedom to dress, would it also include the freedom to undress?

    The SLPs has been filed against the judgment dated March 15 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, upholding Government Order dated 05.02.2022, which has effectively prohibited Petitioners, and other such female Muslim students from wearing the headscarf in their Pre-University Colleges. A Full Bench of the High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit and Justice JM Khazi held that wearing of hijab by women was not an essential religious practice of Islam. The Bench further held the prescription of uniform dress code in educational institutions was not violative of the fundamental rights of the petitioners.

    FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES HERE:

    Live Updates

    • 12 Sep 2022 9:44 AM GMT

      Justice Dhulia : The doctrine of essential religious practice has been laid down in judgments after judgments.

      Mucchala : That is why it has been referred to 9-judges bench.

      J Dhulia : Then you will argue 9-judges can't also hear.

    • 12 Sep 2022 9:43 AM GMT

      Muchhala : I will make it clear. In a case of individual right, the essential religious practice must not be invoked. Somebody may have wrongly applied.

    • 12 Sep 2022 9:43 AM GMT

      Justice Gupta : You are contradicting yourself. First you say question of essential religious practices must be referred to larger bench.

      Muchhala : My submission is certain issues related to interpretation of Constitution must be referred.

    • 12 Sep 2022 9:42 AM GMT

      Mucchala : Somebody must have done erroneously in enthusiasm. But the Court should know its limits.

    • 12 Sep 2022 9:41 AM GMT

      Justice Dhulia : I am not understanding this point. You went to the High Court claiming it as an essential religious practice. What option does the HC have? HC gives a decision one way or other and you say it cannot be done.

    • 12 Sep 2022 9:41 AM GMT

      Mucchala : Constitution clearly provides that Court should not lay down religion for people to follow, Court should not interpret religious scriptures.

    • 12 Sep 2022 9:40 AM GMT

      Mucchala : There are well settled rules of interpreting Quran, with which the Courts are not equipped with.

    • 12 Sep 2022 9:40 AM GMT

      Mucchala : Court should not embark upon the task of interpreting Quran and should not pick up just one view. That is what the High Court has done. The translation of Abdulla Yusuf Ali has been taken as divine words.

    • 12 Sep 2022 9:40 AM GMT

      Muchhala : What the High Court has done is very very objectionable.

    • 12 Sep 2022 9:39 AM GMT

      Justice Gupta : Right to education is under Article 21A and not under 21.

      Mucchala : Under 21A it is only after 14 years. After that an individual has no right to education? 

    Next Story