'Industry' Definition Reference : Live Updates From Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench [Day 2]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

18 March 2026 10:44 AM IST

  • Industry Definition Reference : Live Updates From Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench [Day 2]
    Listen to this Article

    The Supreme Court constitution bench will continue its hearing on the correctness of the definition of “industry” given by then Justice VR Krishna Iyer in the 1978 decision in Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa.

    This is the second day of the hearing.

    A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, Justice BV Nagarathna, Justice PS Narasimha, Justice Dipankar Datta, Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Vipul Pancholi is hearing the matter.

    Follow this page for the live updates. Report of first day's hearing can be read here.

    Live Updates

    • 18 March 2026 12:39 PM IST

      Counsel Gupta: In the indian constitution, the sovereignty rest the people of India and nobody is the employee of the sovereign

    • 18 March 2026 12:38 PM IST

      Adv Verma(for AIIMS): farasat and gupta said that commercial test ought to be applied in completing the triple test. Nagpur had applied the five principle test and the test said that the purpose must be to serve others and it must be done as commerical transaction

    • 18 March 2026 12:34 PM IST

      Counsel 4: my submission is, forest and irrigation are not covered in industry and both departments are doing statutory work which may not be within the parameters of the commercial activities.

    • 18 March 2026 12:33 PM IST

      Counsel 3- bangalore water supply deals with research organisation limited to research, leading to industrial growth and wealth but it does not concern the kind of research org set up by the gov which are under sovereign functions

    • 18 March 2026 12:30 PM IST

      Counsel 2: when legislature has chose the expression using means, it is restrictive and it would not permit an interpretative to expand scope of the coverage of the statute

    • 18 March 2026 12:30 PM IST

      Counsel: but the bangalore said its contradictory but according to me there can be industry without the primarily object being profit

    • 18 March 2026 12:29 PM IST

      Counsel: In order to apply safdargung case, we will have to expand the definition of sovereign function. there is a judgment which says welfare activities have to be included. second, safargung says that you do not necessary have to look at the profit motive, as long as it has commercial sense

    • 18 March 2026 12:27 PM IST

      Gupta: the institutions can provide for it but for that reason, we must not use the behemoth of the ID Act

    • 18 March 2026 12:27 PM IST

      J Nagarathna: they did not go into the merits of the matter

      Gupta: yes, and it provided some compensation to get over the dispute resolution. If I may say, this is an issue and the gov may look into


    • 18 March 2026 12:26 PM IST

      Gupta: one aspect is that there is an order of the court which says temple is not industry-it has a wonderful name. It is not a very significantly reasoned order.

      reads it

    Next Story