High Court Declines Fresh PIL Against 'Kerala Story 2'; Pulls Up Petitioner For Casting Aspersions On Coordinate Bench That Allowed Release

The Kerala High Court on Thursday (March 5) refused to entertain a public interest litigation seeking a direction to re-title the movie 'The Kerala Story 2: Goes Beyond', which was released last week, so as not to include the words “Kerala”/ “Keralam”. A detailed order is awaited.The Division Bench of Chief Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Syam Kumar V.M. orally remarked that similar issues are already pending before a coordinate Division Bench, which is considering appeals against the interim stay granted against the release of the movie.Since the coordinate Division Bench had already passed an order allowing the release of the movie, the Court was of the opinion that if any order is passed in the present PIL, that would amount to dilution of the order already passed."One writ petition is pending, one appeal is pending. So at this stage, it is not proper for us to interfere in this public interest litigation. Because, the prayers, as you said, are substantial issues in the pending appeal as well as the writ petition. There, the writ petitioner can amend the writ petition and ask for appropriate directions. We don't want to open a third. There could be possibility of chance of a different views taken. So conflict of opinion could be there. So, it's better that the Bench hearing that matter should hear this also. So, you approach that bench. We'll tag this along with the matter that is pending, before the appellate Bench...Any order in this stage will have the effect of diluting the order that is already existing in an appeal. So, the comity of court and judicial discipline requires that if a Bench is dealing with a matter where this issue can be raised. So there is already two matters are there, we can tag it and fix it on any date, maybe Monday or Tuesday. Appeal and this petition may be tagged together," the Court orally remarked.During the hearing, the Court also pulled up the petitioners for preferring the PIL instead of asking for a recall of the Division Bench's order or approaching the Supreme Court. It also criticised the petitioners for making an averment that the coordinate Division Bench took up the matter in an unprecedented manner.Chief Justice Sen orally said, "You'll have to remove this. If you are aggrieved, you can go before the Supreme Court. Sitting in a Division Bench, I cannot decide on an observation by another coordinate Bench. Is this permissible in law?...See this was inconsequential for the purpose of deciding the matter. You casting an aspersion against another coordinate Bench. Yes, this is an aspersion...Do you know what exactly happened? Are you aware of it? Exactly what has happened? If you are not aware of it, how could use such loose statements like this? I can issue a contempt for this. Without knowing this, you are making reckless statements. You know the circumstances under which the matter was taken up?"The counsel appearing for the Central Board of Film Certification submitted: "This is clear insinuation...In fact, it is all over the media.""I have only stated that it was mentioned before the Division Bench in an unprecedented manner, which it was," the petitioners' counsel clarified. "Then withdraw this and file a fresh one without paragraph 14....Just remember one thing, you have to respect the institution. We will come, we will go. But the institution will remain. You may criticise a judgment. No problem with that. But you are casting an aspersion. And I am not too sure whether any SLP has been preferred against that order," the Bench told the counsel.The counsel clarified that there is no SLP pending before the Apex Court. Hearing the submission, the Court asked, "Then you are taking up the cause of the persons who are really aggrieved? You are making such statements in paragraph 14." The counsel then unconditionally apologised for including the submissions in the PIL."This was not the manner in which the Bench was constituted, which is well known," submitted the counsel appearing for the producer."That also you do not know. Only I know. None of you knows about it. Don't think that any one of you knows about it. That was a regular roster Bench. That was the Bench having the regular roster. Did you inquire about it? No one enquired but you make posts as if it was something and you tarnish the image of the institution, not understanding that you are not tarnishing the image of a judge, but the image of an institution. You...the law, there is no problem. But don't attack the judge, don't attack the Bench. That I will not allow it. And if persons who have aggrieved, they have not gone to the Supreme Court. So a coordinate Bench will decide whether my other Division Bench has decided the matter correctly or wrongly. Is the law? A different Division Bench will decide the matter in one way or the other. Once it has attained some kind of finality attached to it? Some propriety, decency, decorum has to be maintained. You are an advocate, you are wearing a robe. You are an...

High Court Declines Fresh PIL Against 'Kerala Story 2'; Pulls Up Petitioner For Casting Aspersions On Coordinate Bench That Allowed Release

K. Salma Jennath

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

K. Salma Jennath

High Court Declines Fresh PIL Against 'Kerala Story 2'; Pulls Up Petitioner For Casting Aspersions On Coordinate Bench That Allowed Release

K. Salma Jennath

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

K. Salma Jennath

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers