[Live Updates] SC Hearing On Article 370 & JK Reorganization

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

21 Jan 2020 5:13 AM GMT

  • [Live Updates] SC Hearing On Article 370 & JK Reorganization

    The Constitution Bench comprising Justices N V Ramana, S K Kaul, Subhash Reddy, Surya Kant and BR Gavai is hearing a batch of petitions challenging the Presidential Orders of August 5&6 issued under Article 370 of the Constitution which repealed the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. The bench is also considering the constitutional validity of the J&K Reorganization Act which...

    The Constitution Bench comprising Justices N V Ramana, S K Kaul, Subhash Reddy, Surya Kant and BR Gavai is hearing a batch of petitions challenging the Presidential Orders of August 5&6 issued under Article 370 of the Constitution which repealed the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. 

    The bench is also considering the constitutional validity of the J&K Reorganization Act which bifurcated the state into Union Territories of J&K and Ladakh.

    Follow this page for live updates.

    Live Updates

    • 21 Jan 2020 6:15 AM GMT

      My argument is that Indian Constitution ceases to operate after JK Constitution is formed. - Dwivedi

    • 21 Jan 2020 6:15 AM GMT

      Once the JK Constitution is brought in, then nothing more is to be done and Article 370 goes. Is that your argument? - Justice Kaul

    • 21 Jan 2020 6:13 AM GMT

      Justice Kaul - 370 starts with a non-obstante clause. What is the purpose of 370(3) ?

      DD - The purpose is to state that the provision will cease to operate only with the concurrence of constituent assembly(of J&K).

      #Article370

    • 21 Jan 2020 6:10 AM GMT

      Dwivedi referring to Article 370(2).

      This provision categorically means that after the Constituent Assembly came in to being, there was no occassion for taking concurrence of Assembly.

    • 21 Jan 2020 6:05 AM GMT

      Only Articles 1 and 370 of Indian Constitution will apply to Jammu and Kashmir : Dwivedi.

    • 21 Jan 2020 6:04 AM GMT

      Dwivedi states that the framers had accepted that the State would be by and large independent. The special status of J&K was accepted by the framers of the Constitution

    • 21 Jan 2020 6:03 AM GMT

      Now, referring to the Lists, Dwivedi states that the concurrence of the JK government is required when it comes to implementing policies on subjects not in the IOA. If it’s in accord with the terms of the IOA, then mere consultation is enough, not concurrence.

    • 21 Jan 2020 6:01 AM GMT

      Dwivedi - I may be sounding kind of unusual. But, whether I like it or not or even if your Lordships disagree, this is the case.

    • 21 Jan 2020 5:59 AM GMT

      The State was kept apart and could only be governed with:

      A. Instrument of Accession.

      B. Direct consultation with the State.

      The State becomes a part of the Union only with the help of Art. 370.

      #Article370

    • 21 Jan 2020 5:57 AM GMT

      Now, reading Part 6, Dwivedi is talking about how it talks about the legislature and executive, and how it’s not applicable.

      Even the Schedule wasn’t made applicable to the State. #Art370 was the only tunnel of light through which the Centre-State relationship could be governed.

    Next Story