Maharashtra Governor Moves Supreme Court Against Uttarakhand HC's Contempt Proceeding On Alleged Non-Payment Of Rent Of Govt. Allocated Bungalow

A plea has been preferred in the Supreme Court by Maharashtra Governor Bhagat Singh Koshyari, challenging the issuance of Notice by Uttarakhand High Court on a petition which has sought initiation of contempt proceedings against him.Before the High Court, contempt plea rests on the alleged failure of the Governor to follow an order of payment of market rent for a government bungalow which was allocated to him in his capacity as Chief Minister."The plea states that the aforesaid amount of market rent has been arrived at without any rational (sic) and is highly exorbitant for a residential premises in Dehradun and have been ascertained without affording an opportunity of participation of the petitioner in the process, which renders the process of determination of market rent arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of principles of natural justice," the plea states, towards the total stipulated dues amounting to Rs. 47,57,158/-.It is contended that no legal order was passed by any lawful authority determining the said market rent was ever supplied to the petitioner or submitted before the High Court but the ascertained amounts were placed before High Court on affidavit, which were approved by the Court without applying any judicial mind to ascertain the legality and correctness of the determination."The aforesaid affidavit dated February 12, 2019 was never served upon the petitioner or any other Ex-Chief Minister nor were they given an opportunity to participate in the proceeding of determination of market rent of residential premises allotted them"Koshyari while seeking stay of the High Court order has contended that since he is the sitting Governor of Maharashtra, Article 361 of the Constitution shall be invoked, which provides protection to President and Governors for invocation of such proceedings.Senior Advocate Aman Sinha will argue for the Governor in the Supreme CourtThe Governor has stated that he was in occupation of the residential premises under an order issued by a lawful authority under a rule, which was not in dispute at the time of allotment and vacated the same as soon as he was required by law to do so.The Uttarakhand High Court on May 3 last year had ordered former Chief Ministers of the state to pay market rent for the entire period they continued to occupy government accommodation even after they demitted office.On October 26, Top Court had stayed Contempt proceedings initiated by Uttarakhand High Court in the case concerning alleged non-payment of rents by former Chief Minister of Uttarakhand, Ramesh Pokhriyal Nishank (present Union HRD Minister).

Maharashtra Governor Moves Supreme Court Against Uttarakhand HC's Contempt Proceeding On Alleged Non-Payment Of Rent Of Govt. Allocated Bungalow

Sanya Talwar

Tags