Breaking: "Transgender Has Every Right To Choose Gender": Orissa High Court Orders Family Pension To Transwoman

The Orissa High Court has recently ordered grant of family pension to a transwoman, who was allegedly discriminated on the basis of her gender while allowing pensionary benefits after the death of her parents. A Single Bench of Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra held, "…this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner as a transgender has every right to choose her gender and accordingly, she has submitted her application for grant of family pension under Section 56(1) of Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992. Further such right has been recognized and legalized by judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in NALSA's Case (supra) and as such, the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court is binding on all." Factual Background: The father of the petitioner late Balaji Kondagari was a government servant working in Rural Development Department under Executive Engineer RW Division, Rayagada. After his death, his wife Smt. Binjama Kondagari was sanctioned and disbursed with the family pension. On 11.07.2020, Smt. Binjama Kondagari died due to old age-related health issues. Thereafter the present petitioner, who is a transwoman, applied for sanction of family pension in her favour under Rule 56 of the Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992 to the Executive Engineer RW Division, Rayagada. It was claimed that she and her sister come under the category of "unmarried daughter, widow or divorced daughter" and as such eligible to get family pension. Notably, the Rule 56(1) Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992 provides for pension to specific class of family members of deceased government employee entering into government service and was holding a post in a pensionable establishment on or before 01.01.1964 and family pension to specific class of family members of the deceased government servant, who served and retired/died on or before 31.12.1963. Further the Pension Rules, 1992 under Rule 56(5)(d) provides that family pension is also payable in case of any unmarried daughter even after attaining the age of 25 years till her marriage or death whichever is earlier subject to condition that if the monthly income of the daughter does not exceed Rs. 4,440/- from employment in government, semi-government, statutory bodies, corporation, private sector, self-employment, she shall be eligible to receive family pension. Subsequent to her application, the Rural Development Department/Executive Engineer, RW Division, Rayagada in a letter dated 29.06.2021 had written to the Principal Accountant General (A&E), Odisha, as he had found her eligible to receive family pension and accordingly recommended her case for sanction of family pension amounting to Rs.8,995+TI per month. The said letter further revealed that the family pension shall be payable to the petitioner with effect from 12.07.2020 and shall be subject to the provisions of Rule 56(5) of the Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992 and further it was stipulated that the petitioner shall get family pension till her marriage or death whichever is earlier. It was also found that the authority had recommended the case knowing fully well that the petitioner is a transgender (daughter). Contentions of the Petitioner: Mr. Omkar Devdas, the counsel for the petitioner contended that the authorities did not consider the application of the petitioner for grant of family pension, although the Rule 56 of Orissa Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992 provides for payment of family pension to the unmarried daughter. It was also submitted that since the petitioner belongs to transgender community, the authorities had treated her in a discriminatory manner and had not sanctioned the family pension as is due and admissible to her after the death of her parents. He further submitted that such conduct of the authorities are in gross violation of the pension rules as provided under rule 56(5)(d) which states that in case of an unmarried daughter even after attaining the age of 25 years till her marriage or death whichever is earlier subject to condition that the monthly income of the daughter does not exceed four thousand four hundred and forty per months from the employment in Government, Semi Government, statutory bodies, corporation, private sector, self-employment shall be eligible to receive family pension. It was further highlighted that the petitioner is a transgender (woman) and vide certificate dated 02.12.2021 issued by the District Magistrate under Rule 5 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Rules, 2020 read with Section 6 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, has been given legal recognition as being a transgender (woman). He stressed that the authorities have dealt the case of the petitioner in a discriminatory manner and they have failed to apply the provisions of law as provided under the aforesaid Rules, 2020. In ...

Breaking: "Transgender Has Every Right To Choose Gender": Orissa High Court Orders Family Pension To Transwoman

Jyoti Prakash Dutta

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Jyoti Prakash Dutta

Breaking: "Transgender Has Every Right To Choose Gender": Orissa High Court Orders Family Pension To Transwoman

Jyoti Prakash Dutta

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Jyoti Prakash Dutta

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers