Plea To Direct ECI To Disclose Form 17C Record Of Votes Polled : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing

Maninder: there is a statement made that a discrepancy of 5-6% in the data released - this is absolutely false , the voter turn out will have a difference of 1-2% because it is only secondary data, it is only orally asked to the voters

Maninder: only suspicion and apprehension, nothing to show what is wrong with the system (reading from the submissions of the ADR)

Maninder: these repeated attempts which do not get circumscribed by the judgement of 26th April .....

Maninder submits that the 26th April Judgement already deals with S.49S and 17C form

Maninder: such kind of attitude is causing damage to the public interest by always putting a question mark on the sanctity of the elections

Maninder: s.11, J Datta has referred .....you cannot , when the judgement is delivered in the morning come up with an application later on that this is not covered

Maninder: 26th April document of the ECI annexed but the judgement not annexed in the application filed on 9th

J Datta : let us first hear what Mr Maninder has to say

Maninder: this application is founded only on suspicions and false allegations, and Yourlordships have laid down in both the judgements concurrently that there is no room for suspicion in elections

Dave for ADR : it was not the case of ECI that the petition was not maintainable, both are entirely different issues - one before counting one after counting

Singhvi: mine is writ by Mahua Moirtra , Mr Dave deals with the IA

Maninder for ECI: this application is dated 19 May, this a classic case of abuse of the law, to erode the integrity of the elections