Prashant Bhushan Contempt Case : Live Updates From SC

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

5 Aug 2020 6:33 AM GMT

  • Prashant Bhushan Contempt Case : Live Updates From SC

    The SC is hearing the writ petition filed by Advocate Prashant Bhushan seeking the recall of the contempt notice against him.Live Updates from the hearing...

    The SC is hearing the writ petition filed by Advocate Prashant Bhushan seeking the recall of the contempt notice against him.

    Live Updates from the hearing :

    Live Updates

    • 5 Aug 2020 8:43 AM GMT

      Dave refers to how in the 𝘚𝘱𝘺𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦 "a paper carried a caricature of the judges drawn upside down. No contempt was drawn."

      "To criticise a judge fairly, albeit fiercely, is not a crime, but a right."

    • 5 Aug 2020 8:43 AM GMT

      Dave quotes from another judgment- To criticize a judge fairly, albeit fiercely, is not a crime, but a right.

    • 5 Aug 2020 8:42 AM GMT

      Dave citing judgments from British Courts.

      Quotes Lord Denning-

      We will never use this law to suppress those who speak against us, as there is much more which is at stake, and that is the freedom of speech itself.

    • 5 Aug 2020 8:42 AM GMT

      Bench re-assembles.

    • 5 Aug 2020 7:53 AM GMT

      Bench rises for lunch.

    • 5 Aug 2020 7:52 AM GMT

      Mishra J- Dave, don't you think we have broad shoulders?

      Dave- of course (big smile). I feel though, Perhaps your lordships could have avoided issuing notice. I'm doing my job as a lawyer, you win some you lose some.

      Mishra J- in such a case, you see, no one wins

    • 5 Aug 2020 7:52 AM GMT

      Averring to this, Dave submits that the Court did not take such exception to criticism.

      When Bhushan says 'history will remember', it's an attempt to encourage court to change its approach.

    • 5 Aug 2020 7:52 AM GMT

      Dave now refers to certain pieces over the years where judgements and judges have been criticised.

      Highlights a piece in Indian Express article on ADM Jabalpur judgment where "extremely uncharitable personal remarks against judges were made."

    • 5 Aug 2020 7:51 AM GMT

      Tweets are not against the institution. They are not obstructing administration of justice.

      They are against the judges in their personal capacity regarding their conduct. It's against their individual conduct, but they are not malicious

    • 5 Aug 2020 7:39 AM GMT

      Dave : Neither of the tweets can be said to cause Interference or obstruction of admin of justice

    Next Story