Sabarimala Reference : Live Updates From Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench [Day 2]
LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK
8 April 2026 10:47 AM IST
![Sabarimala Reference : Live Updates From Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench [Day 2] Sabarimala Reference : Live Updates From Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench [Day 2]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2026/04/08/750x450_666354-sabarimala-sc-live.webp)
A 9-judge bench of the Supreme Court will continue hearing the Constitutional issues referred to the larger bench in the Sabarimala review.
This is the second day of the hearing.
Apart from CJI Surya Kant, the Bench comprises Justice BV Nagarathna, Justice MM Sundresh, Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Justice Aravind Kumar, Justice Augustine George Masih, Justice Prasanna B Varale, Justice R Mahadevan and Justice Joymalya Bagchi.
Reports from Day 1 Hearing are given below :
Follow this page for live updates from today's hearing :
Live Updates
- 8 April 2026 1:15 PM IST
Mehta: sabrimala continously proceeds on the ground that morality means constitutional morality and social morality is only mob and therefore what is necessary is constitutional morality-therefore i am saying that as understood by constitutional framers, it is societal morality
- 8 April 2026 1:08 PM IST
J Nagarathna: because sometimes its very subjective, that's why
Mehta: something which is constitutional morality for one judge can't be for another
J Bagchi- the word of article 25(1) is conscience so it is the conscience of a particular section of citizen to be governed by constitutional morality so be it but that doesn't mean that that section will have imprint over the conscience of another groups or sections whose morality would be different standards but within the expansive elastic idea of the society
- 8 April 2026 12:58 PM IST
J Nagarathan: public morality is from the point of view of the followers. constitutional morality is constitutional dharma
Mehta: that's the word but its for how the functionaries or government should function in absence of constitutional provisions
J Bagchi: mr solicitor, you are perhaps says that constitutional morality governs secular rights and the capsule of religious rights have on basis of understood morality of society vis-a-vis the religious tenets followed by religious tenets. secular character of a citizen and the religious beliefs of a citizen can't be emerged in a secular democracy
Mehta: or tested based on one condition that is constitutional morality if its otherwise socially morale and acceptable to cultural ethos of the nation
