The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice in a plea seeking for a transfer of investigation from the State police to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) into the mysterious death of Vikrant Nagaich, a 3rd-year student at National Law University, Jodhpur, in August 2017.
Nagaich had been found dead on 14th August, 2017, under unnatural circumstances near the railway tracks opposite the University, after going out with his friends for dinner the night before. The plea filed by the deceased student's mother, Neetu Kumar Nagaich, contends that the University had been reluctant to inform the parents of the deceased, up until a group of friends of the deceased forced them to do so. Further, apparently statements were made to the media, which depicted that the deceased had committed suicide as he was suffering from depression. Additionally, no efforts had been made by the Police to apprehend suspects. In 2019, the Petitioner-Mother had approached Rajasthan High Court, seeking for the constitution of a Special Investigation Team (SIT). However, in February of this year, the petition was disposed of with the observation with the mere direction that the Investigating Officer may thoroughly investigate the matter. The Bench comprising of Justices RF Nariman, Navin Sinha and BR Gavai, observed that they would first hear the State Police in order to ascertain why the State Police had not made any progress in its investigation over a period of 3 years since Nagaich's death, before considering the plea for transfer of investigation. Advocate Sunil Fernandes appeared in the matter and the plea was filed on behalf of Naigaich's mother, Neetu Kumar Naigaich, by Advocate-on-Record Astha Sharma. The plea contends that the Petitioner is aggrieved by the manner of investigation conducted by the State Police in the case of the unfortunate and untimely demise of her only son and that this tardy investigation "leads to an inescapable and reasonable apprehension that the lackadaisical and negligent investigation and prosecution of the instant FIR is a result of probable collusion to shield some high, mighty and influential person(s)". The plea further avers that not only did the State Investigation Agencies fail to register an FIR for a period of 10 months post the incident, it was ultimately only done in a reluctant manner after the untiring efforts of the victim's parents. It has also been alleged in the plea that despite the lapse of 3 years, no chargesheet had been filed and "the investigation is at a stand-still, with no effort made to apprehend the offenders". The approach towards the investigation is lax and relevant possible witnesses have not been examined on the basis of flimsy grounds. There has also been selective processing of the statements of witnesses, which implies prejudice and malafide intent in a bid to protect local villagers. "The Petitioner is also aware that such conduct of the investigating agency may be on account of the fact that the deceased was not a domicile of the State, and was a student who had come from outside, and therefore, his death is not being investigated to apprehend the perpetrators, who could be locals from the said area". The Investigating Agency has further failed to investigate and analyse the phone records of the deceased. Neither Facebook or Google have been approached, nor has any data been retrieved from the deceased's phone to trace the movement in order to ascertain the events of the fateful night. PayTM transaction from the mobile of deceased has also not been done. Therefore, the plea contends that the obvious lacunae in the investigation into the death of the deceased pinpoints at the investigating agency's reluctance to deviate from their initial conclusion that the deceased had committed suicide. "…without any progress on the investigation despite almost three years to it in August this year both the Local police and CB-CID, have failed to investigate the matter in a diligent manner and the investigation so far has led to no result on account of the continuous acts of omissions and commissions, which is not only dereliction of duty, but reeks of malafide.". In light of the above, the Petitioner is seeking for the transfer of the pending investigation from the Crime Investigation Department, Crime Branch – Jaipur to CBI. The Bench has issued notice in the same and the matter will now be heard in July.