Sec 138 NI Act- Set Up Pilot Courts With Retired Judges For Cheque Bounce Cases In 5 States With Highest Pendency : Supreme Court

With a view of reduce the pendency of cheque bounce cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Supreme Court on Thursday directed the establishment of pilot courts presided over by retired judges in 5 districts of 5 states with the highest pendency (namely, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Delhi and Uttar Pradesh).A bench comprising Justices L Nageswara Rao, BR Gavai and S Ravindra Bhat passed the direction in the suo motu case taken by the Supreme Court last year to deal with the pendency of cheque dishonour cases(In Re Expeditious Trial Of Cases Under Section 138 of N.I Act).The bench stated today that it has accepted the suggestion made by amicus curiae Senior Advoacte Sidharth Luthra for establishment of pilot courts."We have incorporated the suggestions of the Amicus with respect to the setting up of the pilot courts and we have given the timelines also. It is to begin on 01.09.2022 onwards. The Secretary General of this court shall ensure that a copy of the present order is directly communicated to the Registrar General of the said 5 HCs , who should put it before the CJs for immediate action. Compliance report to be filed on or before 21.07.2022. List on 26.07.2022 to review further proceedings", Justice Ravidra Bhat read out the operative portion of the order. Full copy of the order is awaited.The Bench also set out the detailed time line to be followed for the purpose of the pilot study. Duration of Study: 1 year; from 01.09.2022 to 31.08.2023.Number of Courts: 25 Special Court in total (1 in each of the 5 judicial districts with highest pendency as indicated by the respective High Courts)Presiding Officers and Staff: Retired Judicial officer and retired court staff (preferably retired within the past 5 years)Timeline for Identification of Requirements : Infrastructure and officer and support staff to be made available by July, 2022Training: 4 week training by the State Judicial Academies on substantive, procedural and evidence law related to NI Act offences. Pay and Service duration: On Contractual basis for one year . Be paid fixed honorarium in accordance with their standing prior to retirement. Types of Cases: Cases where summon has been served and accused has entered appearance, the oldest matter being taken at first. Timeline for Identification of Cases: All such matters that can be settled be sent for mediation; thereafter a final list to be identified by end of July.Advance and Weekly Lists: Advance list to be circulated by the Special Courts by the end of July. Weekly list can be circulated thereafter. Functioning of Courts: Working days and working hours to be notified by end of July along with circulation of Advance List. Procedure: Cr.P.C.; adjournment not to be routinely granted; outstation witnesses nay be examined online.Mediation: List of mediators to be identified by the end of July. If parties agree they can be referred to time-bound, online mediation.Data collection: Weekly Statement of disposal to be sent to Registrar General of concerned High Court; Quarterly statements to Supreme Court. A Facilitation Officer be appointed to assist in collection of the data, curating case lists and in conducting weekly review meetings with presiding officers to identify additional bottlenecks for future planning purposes.The report submitted by Amicus stated as follows :"It is thus suggested that the High Courts must employ the services of retired judicial officers for this purpose. The human resources required to operationalise these courts could also be drawn from retired court staff. This scheme could be tested on a pilot basis in 5 judicial districts with the highest pendency in the 5 states with the highest pendency (namely, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Delhi and Uttar Pradesh) and the viability of utilising services of retired judicial officers can be examined based on the results of the pilot study".On 27.04.2022, the Court had asked the High Courts of these 5 States to respond to suggestions of the Amici. Bombay High Court had identified Nagpur, Nashik, Thane, Pune and CMM, Mumbai as the 5 district with highest pendency. Rajasthan High Court identified Jaipur Metro-I, Jaipur Metro-II, Jodhpur Metro, Udaipur and Ajmer. Allahabad High Court had identified Lucknow, Agra, Kanpur, Gautambudh Nagar and Ghaziabad. Gujarat High Court concurred with the decision to establish one additional court for trying cased under Section 138, NI Act as per the pilot project. Delhi High Court responded stating that Delhi already has 72 Special Courts for NI Act cases. It is pertinent to noted, that as per the Amici Curiae's report on 08.11.202, there were 26,07,166 complaints pending at various stages before the Courts dealing NI Act trials. By 13.04.2022, the pendency increased to 33,44,290. As per data available on 08.11.2021, 8.81% of the total criminal cases pending in courts were NI Act cases. 11.82% of cases that are pending due to appearance/service related issues are also NI...

Sec 138 NI Act- Set Up Pilot Courts With Retired Judges For Cheque Bounce Cases In 5 States With Highest Pendency : Supreme Court

Sohini Chowdhury

Tags