Top
Top Stories

Non Sending Of Report U/s 57 NDPS Act Within 48 Hours Of Arrest Of Accused Will Not Vitiate Entire Proceedings: SC [Read Judgment]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK
28 Jan 2020 2:47 AM GMT
Non Sending Of Report U/s 57 NDPS Act Within 48 Hours Of Arrest Of Accused Will Not Vitiate Entire Proceedings: SC [Read Judgment]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
599+GST
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Supreme Court has reiterated that merely because the report contemplated under Section 57 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act was not sent within two days of arrest of the accused, the entire proceedings will not be vitiated.

Section 57 of the NDPS Act provides that whenever a person makes any arrest or seizure, he shall, within forty-eight hours next after such arrest or seizure, make a full report of all the particulars of such arrest or seizure to his immediate official superior.

In this case, the counsel for the accused contended that there is a violation of Section 57 of the NDPS Act, since the report was not sent to the Higher Official within the period as prescribed, which has vitiated the entire proceeding.

Rejecting this submission, the bench comprising of Justices Ashok Bhushan and Navin Sinha referred to the judgment in Sajan Abraham vs. State of Kerala, wherein it was held held that non-compliance of Section 57 would not vitiate the prosecution case. It said:

In so far as submissions on the basis of Section 57 of NDPS Act is concerned, it has been held that the said provision is not to be interpreted to mean that in event the report is not sent within two days, the entire proceeding shall be vitiated. The provision has been held to be directory and to be complied with but mere not sending the report within the said period cannot have such consequence as to vitiate the entire proceeding.

In Sajan Abraham, it was held that Section 57 is not mandatory in nature and when substantial compliance has been made it would not vitiate the prosecution case.  

Case name: GURMAIL CHAND vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
Case no.: SLP (Crl.) No(s).9226/2016 
Coram:  Justices Ashok Bhushan and Navin Sinha 
Counsel for Petitioner: Advocates Pawan,  Akashdeep Verma, Pramod Kumar Bhagat and Akshay Verma(AOR )
Counsel for Respondent: Adv Jaspreet Gogia, AOR

Click here to Read/Download Order

Read Order



Next Story