SLP Against HC Order Rejecting Review Petition Cannot Be Entertained When Main Judgment Is Not Challenged: SC [Read Judgment]

Ashok Kini

5 Oct 2020 12:03 PM GMT

  • SLP Against HC Order Rejecting Review Petition Cannot Be Entertained When Main Judgment Is Not Challenged: SC [Read Judgment]

    The Supreme Court has observed that a special leave petition challenging the order of High Court rejecting the review petition cannot be entertained when main judgment in the writ petition is not challenged.When the main judgment of the High Court cannot be effected in any manner, no relief can be granted by this Court in the special leave petition filed against order rejecting review...

    The Supreme Court has observed that a special leave petition challenging the order of High Court rejecting the review petition cannot be entertained when main judgment in the writ petition is not challenged.

    When the main judgment of the High Court cannot be effected in any manner, no relief can be granted by this Court in the special leave petition filed against order rejecting review application to review the main judgment of the High Court, the three judge bench observed.

    In this case, the Cooperative Tribunal imposed punishment of compulsory retirement on an employee of Kuruppampady Service Co-operative Bank. Challenging this order, a writ petition was filed by the employee before the Kerala High Court. The single bench dismissed the writ petition. Later, the writ appeal was also dismissed. The SLP filed against the High Court order was also dismissed by the Apex Court. It was thereafter, a review petition was filed before the High Court, which was also dismissed.

    In the SLP filed challenging the order dismissing the review petition, the bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, MR Shah and R. Subhash Reddy considered the issue whether the present special leave petition is maintainable when the Division Bench judgment has neither been challenged nor can be challenged in this special leave petition?

    In this regard, the bench referred to two decisions: Bussa Overseas and Properties Private Limited and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Anr., (2016) 4 SCC 696 and Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Yashwant Singh Negi, (2013) 2 SCR 550, in which it was held that such SLP is not maintainable. While dismissing the SLP, the court observed:

    "The rationale for not entertaining a special leave petition challenging the order of High Court rejecting the review petition when main order in the writ petition is not challenged can be easily comprehended. Against the main judgment the SLP having been dismissed earlier the same having become final between the parties cannot be allowed to be affected at the instance of petitioner. When the main judgment of the High Court cannot be effected in any manner, no relief can be granted by this Court in the special leave petition filed against order rejecting review application to review the main judgment of the High Court. This Court does not entertain a special leave petition in which no relief can be granted. It is due to this reason that this Court in Bussa Overseas and Properties Private Limited and Anr. (supra) has held that principle of not entertaining special leave petition against an order rejecting the review petition when main judgment is not under challenge has become a precedential principle. We reiterate the above precedential principle in this case again."
    Case name: T.K. DAVID vs. KURUPPAMPADY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. 
    Case no.: SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)NO.10482 OF 2020 
    Coram: Justices Ashok Bhushan, MR Shah and R. Subhash Reddy 

    Click here to Read/Download Judgment

    Read Judgment




    Next Story