Supreme Court Stays Madras HC Order Directing Deposit In CM's Public Relief Fund For Release Of Vehicle

The Supreme Court on Monday stayed a Madras High Court order in so far as it directed deposit of a sum of Rs.1 lakh, as non-refundable deposit, in the Chief Minister's Public Relief Fund, for return of a vehicle allegedly involved in illegal transportation of liquor bottles.Recording the submission on behalf of the petitioner that such a condition, of making the deposit in the CM's Public Relief Fund, could not have been imposed, the bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna issued notice on the SLP.The bench of Justices Chandrachud and Bopanna was hearing an SLP against a September 2021 order of the Madras High Court Single Judge in a Criminal Revision, which in turn was filed against the August, 2021 order passed by the Judicial Magistrate No. II, Salem, whereby the Magistrate had dismissed the petitioner's application for interim custody of the vehicle to be returned.As recorded in the impugned order of the High Court, it is the case of the petitioner that the respondent police registered a case against the accused persons for the offence under Sections 4(1)(aaa), 4(1-A) of TNP Act (Transport) and seized the vehicle TATA 407 (Turbo) TEMPO bearing Reg.No.KA01-C-8853. During the pendency of the investigation, the petitioner filed an application before the Judicial Magistrate-II, Salem, under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C., seeking relief of interim custody of the vehicle and the Magistrate by order dated 23.08.2021 dismissed the same. Challenging the said order, the petitioner filed the revision before the High Court."The case of the prosecution is that on 09.06.201 at about 5.15 p.m. when the respondent/police were conducting vehicle check up near Omalur-Salem Bypass, Karuppur Toll Gate, they intercepted a four-wheeler bearing Regn.No. KA-01-C-8853 and on search, they found liquor bottles (Karnataka State) without any valid permit from the Government. Hence the case in Crime No.178 of 2021 was registered against the accused persons and the vehicle was seized. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle and he has no knowledge about the involvement of his vehicle by the accused persons. He would further submit that the vehicle is kept in an open place in the respondent police station and due to exposure of sun and rain, the value of the vehicle would be diminished. He would submit that the petitioner had filed a petition before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Salem, for return of vehicle whereas, the learned Magistrate, without considering the fact, dismissed the petition. Therefore, the petitioner has filed the present revision before this Court. He would further submit that the petitioner is prepared to abide by any condition imposed by this Court and he would pray that the vehicle may be returned to the petitioner. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the said vehicle is involved in illegal transportation of liquor bottles (Karnataka State) and if the vehicle is released at this stage, there is every possibility of tampering with the engine and chassis number of the vehicle and thereby, the investigation would be defeated. Hence, he objects for release of the vehicle", recorded the High Court.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and that the vehicle is kept in the open space and exposed to natural calamities, the High Court directed the Judicial Magistrate-II, Salem, to return the vehicle "TATA 407 (Turbo) TEMPO" bearing Reg.No.KA-01-C-8853 to the petitioner, on the following conditions:-"(i) The petitioner shall produce the original RC Book of the vehicle and other relevant records to prove his ownership and the learned Magistrate, on perusal of the RC book and other records, retaining the Xerox copy of the same, shall return the original documents to the petitioner with a view to use the vehicle;(ii) The petitioner shall not alter or alienate the vehicle in any manner till confiscation proceedings is over;(iii) The petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only), as nonrefundable deposit through RTGS/NEFT in favour of the Joint Secretary & Treasurer, Chief Minister's Public Relief Fund, Finance (CMPRF) Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009, Tamil Nadu, India, e-mail: jscmprf@tn.gov.in or by Electronic Clearing System (ECS) to Indian Overseas Bank, Secretariat Branch, Chennai 600 009, S.B.Account No.11720 10000 00070, IFS Code IOBA0001172, CMPRF PAN: AAAGC0038F and on such payment and production of proof, the vehicle shall be returned;(iv) The petitioner shall also give an undertaking that he will not use the vehicle for any illegal activities in future and also to produce the vehicle as and when required by the respondent or the Court below as well as by the District Collector of the District or authorized officer in that behalf by the Government;(v) The petitioner shall participate in the confiscation proceedings, if any initiated, and ...

Supreme Court Stays Madras HC Order Directing Deposit In CM's Public Relief Fund For Release Of Vehicle

Mehal Jain

Tags