10 July 2023 6:45 AM GMT
The Supreme Court on Monday extended the interim bail granted on medical grounds to Aam Aadmi Party leader and former cabinet minister of the Delhi government Satyendar Jain in the money laundering case. A division bench of Justice AS Bopanna and Justice M M Sundresh directed Jain's medical reports to be brought on record before the next date of hearing. Senior Advocate Dr Abhishek Manu...
The Supreme Court on Monday extended the interim bail granted on medical grounds to Aam Aadmi Party leader and former cabinet minister of the Delhi government Satyendar Jain in the money laundering case.
A division bench of Justice AS Bopanna and Justice M M Sundresh directed Jain's medical reports to be brought on record before the next date of hearing.
Senior Advocate Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Jain, submitted that 3 different hospitals have recommended surgery. Additional Solicitor General SV Raju appearing for the Enforcement Directorate requested that Jain submit himself to AIIMS for independent evaluation in the meantime. "I have my doubts about the evaluation." ASG SV Raju submitted in Court.
However, the Court asked the medical records to be brought on record first and extended the interim bail granted until further orders. The matter has been posted for further consideration on 24th July.
On 26th May, the Apex Court had granted interim bail to Jain for six weeks to get treated in a private hospital of his choice. The bench had added that Jain shall not go to the media "to make any statement on any issue" and that he shall not attempt to influence the witnesses. The bench however, did not accept the ED's objection that Jain should be independently evaluated by the AIIMS Delhi. It said that this plea can be considered at a later stage.
In 2017, the Central Bureau of Investigation accused Jain and others of laundering money to the tune of Rs 11.78 crore during 2010-2012 and Rs 4.63 crores during 2015-16, when he had become a minister in the Delhi government. It was alleged that the money laundering exercise was carried out through three companies – Paryas Infosolution, Indo Metalimpex, Akinchan Developers, and Mangalayatan Projects.
Jain allegedly had given money to some Kolkata-based entry operators of different shell companies for accommodation entries, through his associates. The entry operators had then allegedly re-routed the money in the form of investment through shares in Jain-linked companies after ‘layering them through shell companies’.
The case lodged by the Directorate of Enforcement is based on the CBI complaint and alleges that Jain signed conveyance deeds for the purchase of agricultural lands by Prayas Infosolutions in 2011 and 2012. The central agency has further alleged that the land was later transferred to family members of Jain's associates who denied knowledge about the transfers.
Last year, the ED year attached properties worth Rs. 4.81 crores belonging to five companies and others in the money laundering case against Jain and others. These assets reportedly were in the name of Akinchan Developers, Indo Metal Impex, Paryas Infosolutions, Mangalayatan Projects, and J.J. Ideal Estate etc. The Aam Aadmi Party leader has been in custody in connection with the money laundering case since May 30, 2022.
In November of last year, the bail application of the former cabinet minister was dismissed by a trial court, which said that it had prima facie come on record that Jain was ‘actually involved’ in concealing the proceeds of crime by giving cash to the Kolkata-based entry operators and thereafter, bringing the cash into three companies against the sale of shares to show that income of these three companies was untainted.
Subsequently, his bail was denied by the Delhi High Court, on the ground that he was an influential person and had the potential of tampering with evidence. As such, the twin conditions under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 were held to not be satisfied. Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma also denied bail to co-accused Vaibhav Jain and Ankush Jain.
Case Title: Satyendar Kumar Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement | Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 6561 of 2023
Click Here To Read/Download Order