Gujarat Riots- Zakia Jafri's Plea Against Clean Chit To Narendra Modi- LIVE UPDATES From Supreme Court Hearing

Sibal: In this case violence has perpetrated through design which is reflected in the documents. I leave it then to your lordship to decide.

Bench: We will continue tomorrow. Mr. Rohatgi would be there. 

Sibal: Despite actionable evidence the court has chosen not to look at it and misread the order of SC.

Sibal: The Republic is like a ship, that ship has to be made steady. It is your task to keep the Republic steady. It would be steady only if majesty of law prevails. This is a case where majesty of law has been deeply injured.

Sibal: That is why we are here. Your Lordships have given us a hearing that suggests that only this court gives maximum leeway when issues of such magnitude comes before it.

Sibal: Your lordships will find none of the issued in the 7 Vol has been decided. In some cases statement of accused recorded and accepted.

Sibal: [HC says]This is revision court, if no material perversity it would not consider it.

Sibal:[HC says] Mag. has rightly concluded on all aspect, but one, that it could not have ordered further investigation. HC says we can move the Trial Court for further investigation.

Sibal: Hate speech is dealt in only the context of ex CM. Then it [HC] deals with extra judicial confession.

Sibal: This is not a case of conspiracy, it is a case of offences. Larger conspiracy can be established only with investigation.

Sibal: With respect to destruction of police control room record [HC says] none of messages were illegal, no objectionable messages.

Sibal: We were taking about PCR messages, they would not be illegal messages. How did it render finding that it was not illegal.

Sibal: Kindly see at pg 94, the issues he captures. The whole issue of why dead bodies were handed over to Jaydeep not discussed.

Sibal: [HC says]The conspiracy was w.r.t Gulberg society. None of these evidence could have been taken into account in Gulberg as per SC judgement of 2013. [HC] Says it cannot be considered as an FIR.