Gujarat Riots: Zakia Jafri's Plea Against Clean Chit To Narendra Modi- Supreme Court Hearing: LIVE UPDATES

Mr. Sibal reads out about the provocative behaviour and mobilisation in that regard

Sibal: Let me just quickly read pgA of Vol II. Provocative behaviour. This was not looked into by the Mag. and HC.

Bench: Shouldn't you first take us what is not there in the closure report.

Bench: Chronology would be what was not dealt with by SIT, Magistrate and then HC.

Bench: Then your main hearing would be withholding of evidence.

Sibal: I take that point. We'll do that.

Sibal: Now if your lordship goes to the volume itself. I'll quickly go through it.

Bench: Phone calls are also part of evidence.

Sibal: With great respect not so. Pandey had withheld call records.

Sibal: Next Tehelka transcript on mass mobilisation, then phone call record, available but not investigated.

Bench: Tehelka should not be separate heading.

Sibal: We will provide revise chart.

Sibal: Moving on to Vol II. First heading - Mass mobilisation and hate speech on 27.02.2002. Second heading - Second component of conspiracy - Inaction of policeman and other public officers. Third heading - Attack start much before bodies reached Ahmedabad.

Sibal: We need not quite frankly read this, they have all denied.

Sibal: All these statements were recorded after that. Ashish's statement is before.Khetan's statement is on 27.08.2009.

Bench: Rest after 01.10.2009?

Sibal: Yes, all afterwards. All this part of the 188 pg CBI document.

Sibal: Your lordships might note four dates.

CBI authentication report - 08.05.2009;

Forwarded to NHRC - 13.05.2009;

NHRC decided to forward copy to SIT, Gandhinagar - 22.09.2009;

Forwarded - 01.10.2009.

They had it from that date.

Bench: Publication in Tehelka 03.11.2007.

Bench: We are not on truthfulness of the statements.

Sibal: I am saying why did the SIT not investigated this.

Bench: We have noted that, but too much emphasis might not be given on these.