The Supreme Court is hearing today petitions filed in 2016 challenging demonetisation of Rs500 & Rs 1000 currency notes.A Constitution Bench will examine if the issue is merely academic now.The pleas challenge the Centre's decision of Nov 2016. The Constitution Bench comprises Justices S Abdul Nazeer, BR Gavai, AS Bopanna, V Ramasubramanian and BV Nagarathna. The case is coming up before...
Live Updates
2022-10-12 05:24:03
12 Oct 2022 11:06 AM IST
AG argues this is a "grey area" where the Court should defer to the wisdom of the govt.
12 Oct 2022 11:04 AM IST
Chidambaram asserts that this is a suitable case for the declaration of the law, says, "declaratory power does not depend on what relief can be granted and what relief cannot be granted"
12 Oct 2022 11:00 AM IST
Chidambaram: This Court must examine the powers u/ss 24 and 26 of the RBI Act, 1934. Tomorrow they can invoke these powers again.
12 Oct 2022 10:59 AM IST
Chidambaram: 1978 demonetisation was by a separate law, ordinance followed by an act...similarly in the 1940's...whether the demonetisation of this kind requires a separate law, that is not academic. This is a live issue.
12 Oct 2022 10:59 AM IST
Divan: There are layers of this challenge.
Refers to a previous Constitution Bench tackling a similar issue.
12 Oct 2022 10:59 AM IST
Divan recommends going through some orders "as they evolved".
Justice Nazeer: If it has become academic, there is no point in wasting the court's time.
12 Oct 2022 10:59 AM IST
Justice Nazeer: We will take the cases one by one, and discard infructuous ones.
Pulls up a petitioner-in-person for being argumentative, says, "We will hear yours last".
12 Oct 2022 10:58 AM IST
Other counsel weigh in. There is no unanimity as to whether this issue must be answered by this Constitution Bench.
12 Oct 2022 10:58 AM IST
Sr Adv P Chidambaram asserts that the exercise has not become academic. AG R Venkataramani disagrees - says, "It is an academic exercise w political implications."
12 Oct 2022 10:57 AM IST
Sr Adv Shyam Divan vehemently disagrees. Says, "It is shocking that SG thinks it is a waste of consti bench's time. These issues must be heard."
We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok