Supreme Court Live Updates : Challenge Against Demonetisation

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

12 Oct 2022 5:24 AM GMT

  • Supreme Court Live Updates : Challenge Against Demonetisation

    The Supreme Court is hearing today petitions filed in 2016 challenging demonetisation of Rs500 & Rs 1000 currency notes.A Constitution Bench will examine if the issue is merely academic now.The pleas challenge the Centre's decision of Nov 2016. The Constitution Bench comprises Justices S Abdul Nazeer, BR Gavai, AS Bopanna, V Ramasubramanian and BV Nagarathna. The case is coming up before...

    The Supreme Court is hearing today petitions filed in 2016 challenging demonetisation of Rs500 & Rs 1000 currency notes.

    A Constitution Bench will examine if the issue is merely academic now.

    The pleas challenge the Centre's decision of Nov 2016.  The Constitution Bench comprises Justices S Abdul Nazeer, BR Gavai, AS Bopanna, V Ramasubramanian and BV Nagarathna. The case is coming up before a CB after six years.

    Follow this page for live-updates.


    Live Updates

    • 12 Oct 2022 7:26 AM GMT

      Chidambaram: Hardships have a bearing on proportionality. Notes for notes, they exchanged. Alladin's lamp...old lamps for new. But the govt was not prepared. Did they print enough currency and keep it in reserve?

    • 12 Oct 2022 7:26 AM GMT

      Chidambaram: If they had to demonetise all series, they should have had the cash ready.

      Justice BVN: We understand the hardship faced by the common man. When we are testing the constitutionality, can the hardships have a bearing?

    • 12 Oct 2022 7:23 AM GMT

      Chidambaram: But what about the non-monetary hardships faced by people? The loss of livelihoods, jobs, wages?

      Justice Nazeer: What should they have done acc to you?

    • 12 Oct 2022 7:21 AM GMT

      Justice Nazeer: It was not a loss per se, because you could exchange it. How do you say it is bad?

      Chidambaram: There could be cases where persons actually suffered a monetary loss. But people who could exchange...there was no monterary loss

    • 12 Oct 2022 7:21 AM GMT

      Chidambaram: If this power exists, such power is unguided and uncanalised and must be struck down.

    • 12 Oct 2022 7:21 AM GMT

      Chidambaram: Does the power to demonetise all series of a denomination flow from S 26(2)? That is a drastic power. If this Court says yes, then I am saying it is unconstitutional and violative of FRs. Either read it down or strike it down.

    • 12 Oct 2022 7:21 AM GMT

      Chidambaram: The ques is did you apply your mind when implementing this policy? Then where is the record? 

    • 12 Oct 2022 7:16 AM GMT

      Chidambaram: There were not enough currency notes. Remonetisation took several months. Further, what was the geographical distribution of bank branches and ATMs in diff parts of the country? The pt is, all these factors inform the decision.

    • 12 Oct 2022 7:15 AM GMT

      Chidambaram: ATMs were not calibrated to receive or dispense 2000 rupee notes. Recalibration took months...Given the capacity of the press, there was apart from the legal limit of exchange, there was a practical limit of exchange.

    • 12 Oct 2022 7:15 AM GMT

      Chidambaram: In 1946 and 1978, a v small proportion of notes were withdrawn. But still there was a window for exchange. But there was no need to remonetise because of the small proportion. Today, we only remonetised through 500 and 2000 notes

    Next Story