Char Dham Road Project: Supreme Court Directs High Powered Committee To Consider Applications Against Reduction Of Width

In Char Dham road project matter, the Supreme Court on Wednesday asked the High Powered Committee set-up by it to consider the applications filed before the Court by the Ministry of Defence and the Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, against reducing the road width, in two weeks.The ministries had sought permission for the widening of the road in border areas and the completion of the Char Dham road project with the originally specified width.The bench of Justices R. F. Nariman, Navin Sinha and K. M. Joseph required the HPC to share a detailed report within a week after the meeting, and for the MoD and the MoRTH to comment on the same."Two ministries are not working in tandem with each other. That is, the MoD and the MoRTH. We have said that the subsequent circular (2018) issued by the MoRTH has to be followed. Has it been amended?", observed Justice Nariman on Wednesday."They had asked me and I advised them against amending the circular as the matter is before this Court", submitted AG K. K. Venugopal."Amend it first. And secondly, we will order the HPC to meet immediately, as the problem is between the Chairman and the Secretary, and to consider all the IAs by the MoD before us. Then it can come back to us and we will see what to do. Let it consider all issues- including the two letters written by the Chairman to us, and the matters subjudice before us. Then it can come to us with the minutes of the meeting", observed Justice Nariman.Reportedly, the application by the defence ministry, presented by solicitor general Tushar Mehta, said, "The roads should have capacity to facilitate movement of heavy vehicles carrying troops, self propelled artillery and various machinery required by the army. For this purpose a double lane road having a carriageway width of 7m (or 7.5m where there is a raised kerb) is necessary to meet requirements of the army. The very security of the nation is involved and it has become necessary to seek modification of the September 8 order."The road ministry had claimed that a substantial reduction in the width of the road to 5.5m in terms of the 2018 circular at this stage will result in non-uniform carriageway width varying from 10m to 5.5m in short stretches. "This sudden change in road width in a short road length is not desirable from road users' safety perspectives and may lead to the formation of black spots and spurt in road accidents," said the ministry.The Supreme Court had on September 8 directed that the width of hilly and mountainous terrains for the Char Dham Highway project to be constructed in accordance with the 2018 circular of the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH).A 3-judge bench comprising of Justices Nariman, Sinha and Indira Banerjee took into consideration the current situation with regard to the eco system and fragility of the mountain terrains to order that the width of the road would remain at 5.5 metres.A High Power Committee constituted by Supreme Court in August 2019 submitted a Report in July 2020 whereby 13 members recommended following standards prescribed in a circular from 2012 while 5 members, including the Chairman, were in favour of going ahead according to the 2018 circular.The 2018 circular prescribes a width of 5.5 metres for the intermediate lane configuration along with two-lane structures for National Highways in hilly and mountainous terrains.Solicitor General Tushar Mehta contended that it was only a minority view of the Committee that the 2018 circular be complied with. Adding that since the road covers the India-China Border, the terrain in question sees movement of Army vehicles. Therefore, he urged, the width of the carriageway must be 7 metres wide, not 5.5 metres.Refusing to accept this submission, Justice Nariman asserted that "the 2018 circular will alone apply.""Shri Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General, persisted with his arguments that the 2018 circular is only prospective in nature. We are well aware of the distinction between something which is retrospective in the sense that it applies for the first time to projects which are already completed as opposed to ongoing projects, where it is necessary to take stock of the current situation and then move forward. Having taken stock of the current situation and of the fragility generally of the eco system in mountain terrain, we are of the view that this argument has no legs to stand on." -Records the Order.Appearing for the Citizens for Green Doon, the Petitioner NGO, senior advocate Sanjay Parikh apprised court of devastation caused to mountains as a result of violations of directions by authorities.Recording that a "great deal of devastation has occurred in certain areas and that plantation should be taken up in right earnest", the Apex Court noted that "we have no doubt that this will be carried out" and disposed off the application.The char dham project is a 900KM, all-weather highway project which connects four towns state of Uttarakhand including Yamunotri, ...

Char Dham Road Project: Supreme Court Directs High Powered Committee To Consider Applications Against Reduction Of Width

Mehal Jain

Tags