SGI: There has to be justification for restriction, and object to achieved and the nexus between them…least rest measures considered, adopted and their admission that beyond this we cannot do anything and that they are considering.

SGI: says that the goal is that exam be conducted on June 21. And the goal is legitimate. I have shown we have employed less restrictive measures.

SGI says that potential harm is huge and power exists to pass such a direction and hence requests court may not interfere at this stage

Court asks number of students taking the exam

SGI: 22 lakhs.

SGI says that the interim direction says that backdating is the real threat

Court: backdating direction is till 30th.

Court: There is application of mind. Temporary event based action is only till Monday. They will continue to keep editing feature unavailable till 30th.

SGI says this had happened in 2024.

SGI: they can post something today with editing and say that it (paper) was already available on the June 19. That is where public order comes.

SGI: they have a feature called date and time editing.

Court: if it is law and order situation blocking maybbe in public interest. That is where test of porportionality. Have you examined here larger public good?

SGI: Anuradha Bhasin permits that for a temporary period…anuradha basin does not prohibit blocking

Court: is your exercise of right in facts and circumstances proportional?

SGI: when internet is banned in state, only 10% maybe miscreants…