'The Kerala Story' Movie Case : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing

Singhvi: Whenever Hindu or Christian girls are seen tortured, these statements are made, communal statements.

Singhvi: We have said in affidavit that this figure is 3. This 32000 figure is a part of movie itself. What is the point of removing the teaser?

Singhvi: This is the report of police officers. The actual movie has it...what is the point of removing the teaser? The movie says 32000 women are missing.

Singhvi: People in Delhi don't see. The problem is public exhibition, public display of emotion

CJI: You can't make fundamental rights be dependent on public display of emotion. Public display of emotion has to be controlled. You don't like it, don't see.

Singhvi: He says that the teaser is taken down. Please see this...the top police officer has said this...

Singhvi: Paschim Bengal's demographic is very different. That has to be considered.

CJI DY Chandrachud: You can't expect demographic to be same everywhere...power is to be exercised in proportional way.

CJI DY Chandrachud: The film has been released everywhere in the country.

Singhvi: This disclaimer is making it worse. [Reads disclaimer]

It says "inspired by true events" two times. Is this a disclaimer? This is clever legal words.

Singhvi: The disclaimer they put is a reiteration. I cannot use my statutory power to prevent breach of peace? 

Singhvi: The movie ran from 5th May to 8th May, we didn't stop it. In Prakash Jha, Aarakshan- it is a threshold stoppage pre screening. We provided security, film ran. Now I'll show intelligence report which shows there was serious threat.