Uddhav Thackeray vs Eknath Shinde : Live Updates From Supreme Court In Shiv Sena Case

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

21 Feb 2023 4:49 AM GMT

  • Uddhav Thackeray vs Eknath Shinde : Live Updates From Supreme Court In Shiv Sena Case

    A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will hear today the cases related to rift in the Shiv Sena party, which led to the political changes in Maharashtra in June-July 2022.A 5-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud had on last Friday deferred the decision on the preliminary question whether to reconsider the decision in Nabam Rebia vs Deputy Speaker which held that a...

    A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will hear today the cases related to rift in the Shiv Sena party, which led to the political changes in Maharashtra in June-July 2022.

    A 5-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud had on last Friday deferred the decision on the preliminary question whether to reconsider the decision in Nabam Rebia vs Deputy Speaker which held that a Speaker cannot decide disqualification petitions when a motion seeking his removal is pending. The bench said that the question of reference cannot be decided in isolation from facts and decided to hear the matter on merits from today.

    Justices MR Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha are the other members of the bench.

    The following are the issues before the 5-judge bench.

    A. Whether the notice of removal of the speaker restricts him from continuing the disqualification proceedings under Schedule X of the Indian Constitution as held by the Court in Nabam Rebia;

    B. Whether a petition under Article 226 and Article 32 lies inviting a decision on a disqualification proceeding by the High Courts or the Supreme Court as the case may be;

    C. Can a court hold that a member is deemed to be disqualified by virtue of his/her actions absent a decision by the Speaker?

    D. What is the status of proceedings in the House during the pendency of disqualification petitions against the members?

    E. If the decision of speaker that a member was incurred disqualification under the Tenth Schedule relates back to the date of the complaint, then what is the status of proceedings that took place during the pendency of the disqualification petition?

    F. What is the impact of the removal of Para 3 of the Tenth Schedule? (which omitted "split" in a party as a defence against disqualification proceedings)

    G. What is the scope of the power of the Speaker to determine the whip and leader of house of the legislative party?

    H. What is the interplay with respect to the provisions of the Tenth Schedule?

    I. Are intra-party questions amenable to judicial review? What is the scope of the same?

    J. Power of the governor to invite a person to form the government and whether the same is amenable to judicial review?

    H. What is the scope of the powers of Election Commission of India with respect to deter an ex parte split within a party.

    Follow this page for live-updates from the hearing.

    Live Updates

    • 21 Feb 2023 10:08 AM GMT

      Sibal: The bottom line is, there is no concept of split anymore.

    • 21 Feb 2023 10:08 AM GMT

      Sibal: If you're disqualified you cannot be a minister. Now your disqualification is pending before the court, before the speaker. And you're appointed at the minister?

    • 21 Feb 2023 10:03 AM GMT

      Sibal: Yes and they never said they had a split. They said they're the real shiv sena.

    • 21 Feb 2023 10:01 AM GMT

      CJI DY Chandrachud: Quantam of split was not defined interestingly.

    • 21 Feb 2023 10:00 AM GMT

      Sibal: What we need to note is that he cannot vote contrary to direction issued by political party. So it's the political party, not the legislative party, who issues directions.

    • 21 Feb 2023 9:59 AM GMT

      Sibal: They don't consider the organisation. They consider the majority who as per us are disqualified...and give it to them.

    • 21 Feb 2023 9:59 AM GMT

      Sibal: We both relied upon the 2018 constitution. But the commission in its order said that the 2018 constitution was not put before them.

    • 21 Feb 2023 9:53 AM GMT

      Sibal: It's not as if it's some overwhelming majority with them. 3 Rajya sabha are with us. 6 in lok sabha are with us. So in two houses they have majority, in two houses, we have majority.

    • 21 Feb 2023 9:49 AM GMT

      Sibal: Election commission, on 8th Oct, without hearing either of the party, freezed the symbol of bow and arrow. Hearing is mandatory.

    • 21 Feb 2023 9:49 AM GMT

      Sibal: I told them that if they take the symbol and then get disqualified, what happens to the symbol? Do we then get back the symbol?

    Next Story