Live Law
academy Icon lawbiz Icon
LoginAccount
Subscribe Premium
  • MoreMore
  • Top StoriesTop Stories
  • Supreme CourtSupreme Court
  • SearchSearch
  • LiveLaw Hindi
  • Top Stories
  • Supreme Court
    • SC Judgements
  • High Court
    • All High Courts
    • Allahabad High Court
    • Andhra Pradesh High Court
    • Bombay High Court
    • Calcutta High Court
    • Chhattisgarh High Court
    • Delhi High Court
    • Gauhati High Court
    • Gujarat High Court
    • Himachal Pradesh High Court
    • High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh
    • Jharkhand High Court
    • Karnataka High Court
    • Kerala High Court
    • Madhya Pradesh High Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Manipur High Court
    • Meghalaya High Court
    • Orissa High Court
    • Patna High Court
    • Punjab and Haryana High Court
    • Rajasthan High Court
    • Sikkim High Court
    • Telangana High Court
    • Tripura High Court
    • Uttarakhand High Court
  • News Updates
  • Articles
  • Law Schools
    • Call For Papers
    • Moot Courts & Competitions
    • Seminars & Conferences
    • Law School News
    • Student Articles
    • Admissions
    • Courses
    • Law Exams
    • Scholarships
    • Internships & Placements
  • Law Firms
  • Digests
    • Digests Weekly
    • Digests Monthly
    • Digests Quarterly
    • Digests Yearly
  • Law Firms
    • Deal News
    • Events
    • Foreign Law Firms
    • Internships
    • Law Firm Articles
    • Litigation
    • Professional Announcement
  • Law Schools Corner
    • Law School Articles
    • Scholarships/Fellowships
    • School Admission
  • Job Updates
  • More
    Consumer CasesBook ReviewsRounds UpsEventsInternationalTaxEnvironmentPodcast
    IBCArbitrationSponsoredLabour & ServiceTech & LawCorporate LawVideosIPR
  • LiveLaw Hindi
  • Top Stories
  • Supreme Court
    • SC Judgments
  • High Court
    • All High Courts
    • Allahabad High Court
    • Andhra Pradesh High Court
    • Bombay High Court
    • Calcutta High Court
    • Chhattisgarh High Court
    • Delhi High Court
    • Gauhati High Court
    • Gujarat High Court
    • Himachal Pradesh High Court
    • High Court of Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh
    • Jharkhand High Court
    • Karnataka High Court
    • Kerala High Court
    • Madhya Pradesh High Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Manipur High Court
    • Meghalaya High Court
    • Orissa High Court
    • Patna High Court
    • Punjab and Haryana High Court
    • Rajasthan High Court
    • Sikkim High Court
    • Telangana High Court
    • Tripura High Court
    • Uttarakhand High COurt
  • News Updates
  • Articles
  • Law Schools
    • Call For Papers
    • Law School Articles
    • Placements
    • Scholarships Fellowships
    • Law Exams
    • Diploma/Certificate Courses
    • Law School Admission
    • Interships
    • Seminars
    • Competitions
  • Digests
    • Digests Weekly
    • Digests Monthly
    • Digests Quarterly
    • Digests Yearly
  • Law Firms
    • Deal News
    • Foreign Law Firms
    • Law Firm Articles
    • Events
    • Internship
    • Litigation
    • Professional Announcement
  • Job Updates
  • More
    • Consumer Cases
    • Book Reviews
    • Round Ups
    • Events
    • International
    • Corporate Law
    • Podcast
    • IBC
    • Arbitration
    • Spronsored
    • Labour & Service
    • Tech & Law
    • Videos
Live Law Subscription
  • Home
  • /
  • ausaf ayyub
ausaf ayyub

ausaf ayyub

If The Imposition Of LD Was Contingent On Extension Of Time, Recovery Of LD Is Not Time Barred: Delhi High Court

If The Imposition Of LD Was Contingent On Extension Of Time, Recovery Of LD Is Not Time Barred: Delhi High Court

1 Aug 2022 4:15 PM IST

Notice Of Proceeding Under Section 11 Of The A&C Act Is A Mandatory Requirement: Madhya Pradesh High Court

Notice Of Proceeding Under Section 11 Of The A&C Act Is A Mandatory Requirement: Madhya Pradesh High Court

31 July 2022 8:00 PM IST

Application Under Section 11 Of The A&C Act Is Maintainable Despite The Pendency Of Reference Before The MSME Council: Jharkhand High Court

Application Under Section 11 Of The A&C Act Is Maintainable Despite The Pendency Of Reference Before The MSME Council: Jharkhand High Court

31 July 2022 7:23 PM IST

Pendency Of Arbitration Is Not A Bar To The Maintainability Of An Admiralty Suit For Arrest Of The Ship: Bombay High Court

Pendency Of Arbitration Is Not A Bar To The Maintainability Of An Admiralty Suit For Arrest Of The Ship: Bombay High Court

29 July 2022 9:30 AM IST

The Arbitrator Cannot Alter The Express Terms Of The Agreement Between The Parties By Applying The Business Efficacy Test: Delhi High Court

The Arbitrator Cannot Alter The Express Terms Of The Agreement Between The Parties By Applying The Business Efficacy Test: Delhi High Court

27 July 2022 8:15 PM IST

Section 29A Of The A&C Act  Applies Prospectively Does Not Apply To Arbitration That Commenced Before The 2015 Amendment: Bombay High Court

Section 29A Of The A&C Act Applies Prospectively Does Not Apply To Arbitration That Commenced Before The 2015 Amendment: Bombay High Court

27 July 2022 7:45 PM IST

Sections 15 And 16 Of The MSMED Act Are Mandatory Provisions, Arbitrator Must Assign Reasons For Not Awarding Compound Interest: Delhi High Court

Sections 15 And 16 Of The MSMED Act Are Mandatory Provisions, Arbitrator Must Assign Reasons For Not Awarding Compound Interest: Delhi High Court

26 July 2022 9:30 AM IST

The Arbitrator Cannot Award A Lumpsum Amount As Against Specified Claims Without Adjudicating The Claims: Delhi High Court

The Arbitrator Cannot Award A Lumpsum Amount As Against Specified Claims Without Adjudicating The Claims: Delhi High Court

22 July 2022 10:00 AM IST

No Claim Certificate Is Invalid If It Is A Pre-Condition To The Release Of Final Payment: Calcutta High Court

No Claim Certificate Is Invalid If It Is A Pre-Condition To The Release Of Final Payment: Calcutta High Court

22 July 2022 9:30 AM IST

A Party Can Withdraw Its Consent For Reference To Arbitration Under Section 89 Of The CPC Anytime Before The Court Acts Upon Such Consent: Gujarat High Court

A Party Can Withdraw Its Consent For Reference To Arbitration Under Section 89 Of The CPC Anytime Before The Court Acts Upon Such Consent: Gujarat High Court

22 July 2022 8:30 AM IST

Section 11(6A) Arbitration Act Does Not Prevent Courts From Considering Issue Of Arbitrability : Supreme Court

Section 11(6A) Arbitration Act Does Not Prevent Courts From Considering Issue Of Arbitrability : Supreme Court

22 July 2022 7:45 AM IST

Non Applicability Of Section 9 Of The A&C Act  Cant Be Presumed  If Parties Opted For Foreign-Seated Institutional Arbitration: Delhi High Court

Non Applicability Of Section 9 Of The A&C Act Can't Be Presumed If Parties Opted For Foreign-Seated Institutional Arbitration: Delhi High Court

20 July 2022 4:00 PM IST

  • Previous
  • Next
X
We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok
x
IP subscription is detected for  
Please register yourself for unlimited free access.
Redirecting to register page...