J Nagarathna: in the context of sabarimala controversy, how is article 26 relevant?

SG: their arguments was it is a religious denomination.

J Nagarathna: the temple is open to all hindus

SG: argument was it is a denominational temple and the court said its not. article 26(b) was placed to argue that it can manage its affairs- court said its not a denomination and 26(b) has been given an expansive meaning