Venugopal: as a matter of logical consistency, I would say that article 25(1) is an individual right which is subject to these restrictions whereas, article 26 is subject to only three restrictions and doesn't bring article 25 but legitimate state goals can be met under public order, morality and health.

assume for the sake of the argument that article 25(2) applies to even religious denomination as well as religion. for the time being, I just want to say that the essential religious practice test has no textual foundation whatsoever in article 25(2)(a).

the test which I can recite from my memory is 'nothing in this article shall prevent the state from making a law to regulate economic, financial, and political activities or secular activities associated with religious practice.' the word essential doesn't come thre.