Raju: having addressed these questions, I will proceed on an unframed question to satisfy the doubts. I make it with a caveat

CJI: Mr Raju, you need to very briefly point out the significant departure from 1949 to 2016 Act? if 1949 adequate reforms in terms of powers and as an existing law if it survived and now if new legislation came into force, what is the apprehension?

J Kumar: there is an application for amendment, what is it?

Raju: since the view of some member has been expressed very strongly,

CJI: From our side, all observations are tentative. The stronger the doubt we seek clarity