News Updates

Benefit Of Probation Can't Be Extended To Convicts Under Gambling Act: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Judgment]

Divya Kathuria
12 Jan 2017 10:20 AM GMT
Benefit Of Probation Cant Be Extended To Convicts Under Gambling Act: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Judgment]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently in Sanjay v. State of MP, has decided the question whether a person convicted for gambling by the trial as well as revisional court be released on probation of good conduct after admonition under Section 360 of CrPC. The applicant did not challenge the findings of the courts below on merits and merely confined his submissions that the applicant may be extended the benefit of Section 360.

The bench observed that a wide discretion is vested in the courts while deciding such pleas.

The court upheld the view of revision court while discussing various factors that may be helpful in deciding if the convict may be released on probation. While deciding such cases, the nature of offence as well as its impact on the social fabric of the nation must be borne in mind. The sociological backdrop of the accused, the circumstances in which the offence is committed and the age of the accused are other factors which the court emphasized upon.

The Bench observed that gambling has become a menace to the peaceful society

“ It adversely affect the financial position of the family of the persons who are involved in gambling. If a person loses money in gambling then it can be safely said that the money which could have been utilized for upbringing the children of the family or for looking after the elder persons of the family has been misused while gambling", it said

The Bench held that the act of gambling not only affect” the person individually who is involved in such an act but it adversely affects the entire family of the said person, therefore, gambling can be safely said to be an act which affects the society at large.

Considering the case of applicant in particular, ill-effects of gambling on the family of gambler as well as the society, the high court observed that the trial court has already taken a very lenient view by imposing fine of Rs.100, and thus, denied to accept the application of the convict.

Read the Judgment here.

This article has been made possible because of financial support from Independent and Public-Spirited Media Foundation.
Next Story