Madhya Pradesh High Court Weekly Roundup: October 13 - October 19, 2025

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 219 to 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 226Nominal IndexX v Y 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 219Prosecutrix X v State P 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 220Public Works Department v Panna 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 221Shivram Chaudhary v Verendra Kumar Mishra 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 222Smt Saroj v Rajendra Prasad Patel 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 223V v SS 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 224Rambhuvan Gautam v State 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 225Karan...

Ex-CISF Personnel Entitled To Purchase Liquor From CAPF Canteens : Kerala High Court

Denying liquor quota to ex-CISF officers from CAPF canteens when the same is allowed for other CAPF officers is discriminatory, the Court held.

NCLT Has Jurisdiction U/S 60(5)(C) IBC To Adjudicate Lease Disputes In Liquidation Proceedings: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court bench led by Justice Niral R. Mehta held that the NCLT has jurisdiction under section 60(5)(c) of the IBC to adjudicate the lease and license dispute during the liquidation proceedings. The petitioners, Fivebro Water Services Pvt. Ltd. and another, had the lease and license agreements with the corporate debtor for its premises in Ahmedabad and Mumbai....

Limitation Under Rule 68B Of Income Tax Act Does Not Apply To RDDB Act Proceedings: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court held that the limitation under Rule 68B of the second schedule to the Income Tax Act does not apply to RDDB Act (Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993) proceedings. Justice Mohammed Nias C.P. stated that Rule 68B of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961, has no mandatory application to recovery proceedings under the RDDB...

Teachers' Absence Violates Poor Students' Right To Education: Allahabad High Court Seeks Strict Rules Ensuring Full Attendance In Rural Schools

In a significant order underscoring the sanctity of a teacher's duty and the constitutional right of every child to education, the Allahabad High Court recently called for the formulation of strict rules to ensure that teachers in rural primary and junior schools remain present throughout the school hours. A bench of Justice Praveen Kumar Giri observed that absenteeism among teachers...

Statutory Interest Mandatorily Payable U/S 56 GST Act On Refunds Delayed Beyond 60 Days: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court held that statutory interest mandatorily payable under Section 56 GST Act on refunds delayed beyond 60 days. Justices Bhargav D. Karia and Pranav Trivedi stated that the provision of section 56 of the GST Act is a mandatory provision and the interest which is required to be paid under section 56 is compensatory in nature for delayed payment of refund...

Karur Stampede: Madras High Court Grants Bail To TVK Salem District Secy Booked For Assaulting Ambulance Driver

The Madras High Court has granted bail to N Venkatesan, Salem District Secretary of Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam Party for allegedly assaulting an ambulance driver in the aftermath of the Karur Stampede last month. Justice S Srimathy ordered Vebkatesan to be released on bail by executing a surety for Rs. 10,000 on the condition that he report before the Karur Town Police Station daily...

Sabarimala Gold Loss: Kerala High Court Directs SIT To Investigate Into Larger Conspiracy Behind Misappropriation, Role Of TDB Officials

The Kerala High Court on Tuesday (October 21) observed that investigation into the alleged misappropriation of gold from the Dwarapalaka idols and side frames of the Sabarimala temple needs to be carried out under its direct and continuous supervision in order to ensure a fair, transparent and expeditious process. It also directed that a thorough investigation be carried out into the...

Bombay High Court Quashes Acquisitions Under Maharashtra Slum Act Without Recognising Developler's Preferential Rights

The Bombay High Court has quashed the acquisition of private land under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, holding that the authorities acted without considering the developer's preferential right to redevelop the property. The Court observed that such actions violate the property rights guaranteed under Article 300A of the Constitution and...

Act Against Erring Cops If Minors Found Falsely Implicated In Rioting Case: Allahabad High Court Directs Bahraich SP

The Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) recently directed the Superintendent of Police, Bahraich, to look into the 'false implication' of two minors, aged 13 and 11 years, in an FIR lodged under various provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the SC-ST Act. A Bench of Justice Rajesh Singh Chauhan and Justice Amitabh Kumar Rai directed appropriate action against erring...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Weekly Round-Up [Oct 13-Oct 18]

Punjab & Haryana High Court Weekly Round-Up [Oct 13-Oct 18]Citation [LiveLaw (PH) 405 to 408]RAM KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 405Vinay Sahotra v. The Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and others LiveLaw (PH) 406XXXX v. XXXX LiveLaw (PH) 407 HARDEV SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS LiveLaw (PH) 408 Khairati Lal v. State of Haryana and others LiveLaw...

'Remedy U/S 6 Of Specific Relief Act Cannot Be Granted To Person Having No Intention To Reside In Suit Premises': Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that relief under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, which provides protection of possession, cannot be granted to a person who has no bona fide intention of residing in the suit premises. The Court emphasised that equitable relief under Section 6 must be exercised in favour of a person with a genuine intent to enjoy the property and not for...